Acta cytologica · 2002
Primary screening with liquid-based cytology in an unscreened population in rural China, with an emphasis on reprocessing unsatisfactory samples.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Belinson Jerome L, Pan Qiong-Jing, Biscotti Charles, Wu Ling-Ying, Pretorius Robert G, Li Ling, Elson Paul, Rong Shou-De, Zhang Wen-Hua, Qiao You-Lin
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of liquid-based cytology in a high-risk, unscreened population.
STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional comparative trial of multiple screening techniques. This report focuses on the performance of liquid-based cytology using biopsy as the standard.
RESULTS: In total, 1,997 women were screened. All subjects had a minimum of five cervical biopsies. Of the subjects, 4.3% had CIN 2 on biopsy. The ThinPrep Pap with ASCUS as positive had a sensitivity for CIN 2 of 94% and specificity of 78%; the sensitivity for CIN 3 was 98% and for cancer, 100%. The unsatisfactory rate due to bloody specimens was 7.9% (158/1,997). After reprocessing, the unsatisfactory rate was 0.15% (3/1,997).
CONCLUSION: Reprocessing effectively recovers ThinPrep samples otherwise unsatisfactory due to blood and mucus. The ThinPrep Pap test is a highly sensitive screening test when used in a high-risk, unscreened population.
STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional comparative trial of multiple screening techniques. This report focuses on the performance of liquid-based cytology using biopsy as the standard.
RESULTS: In total, 1,997 women were screened. All subjects had a minimum of five cervical biopsies. Of the subjects, 4.3% had CIN 2 on biopsy. The ThinPrep Pap with ASCUS as positive had a sensitivity for CIN 2 of 94% and specificity of 78%; the sensitivity for CIN 3 was 98% and for cancer, 100%. The unsatisfactory rate due to bloody specimens was 7.9% (158/1,997). After reprocessing, the unsatisfactory rate was 0.15% (3/1,997).
CONCLUSION: Reprocessing effectively recovers ThinPrep samples otherwise unsatisfactory due to blood and mucus. The ThinPrep Pap test is a highly sensitive screening test when used in a high-risk, unscreened population.