Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie · 2005
[Evaluation of the Global Abdominal Method (ABDO-MG) in the treatment of urinary incontinence].
Клиническое исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Godbout Manon, Le Tu Mai, Watier Alain, Black Robert
Аннотация
AIMS OF STUDY: Assessment of the Abdominal Global Method (ABDO-MG) in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence or mixed incontinence with stress predominance in women.
METHODS: Thirty patients with clinically and urodynamically proven genuine stress incontinence or mixed incontinence with stress predominance were enrolled. Patients had 4 weeks of ABDO-MG technique under supervision and a home unit to do their exercises, then 8 weeks of home exercises without home unit or supervision. We compared the results for each patient before the treatment, at 4 and 12 weeks post initiation of the technique. Main outcome measures were short Pad test with standardized bladder volume and exercises as well as self-report of degrees of incontinence.
RESULTS: The data showed improvement in leakage on short Pad test from 82.0 g before versus 38.8 g and 24.8 g at 4 and 12 weeks respectively (p = 0.0002). Seventeen of thirty patients were completely dry. All patients reported improvement of their condition after 4 weeks of exercises and almost cure at 12 weeks (p = 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study demonstrating the clinical efficacy, both objectively and subjectively, of the technique ABDO-MG in the treatment of genuine stress urinary incontinence and mixed incontinence with stress predominance in women. Our data are encouraging, however long-term study with control group is warranted.
METHODS: Thirty patients with clinically and urodynamically proven genuine stress incontinence or mixed incontinence with stress predominance were enrolled. Patients had 4 weeks of ABDO-MG technique under supervision and a home unit to do their exercises, then 8 weeks of home exercises without home unit or supervision. We compared the results for each patient before the treatment, at 4 and 12 weeks post initiation of the technique. Main outcome measures were short Pad test with standardized bladder volume and exercises as well as self-report of degrees of incontinence.
RESULTS: The data showed improvement in leakage on short Pad test from 82.0 g before versus 38.8 g and 24.8 g at 4 and 12 weeks respectively (p = 0.0002). Seventeen of thirty patients were completely dry. All patients reported improvement of their condition after 4 weeks of exercises and almost cure at 12 weeks (p = 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study demonstrating the clinical efficacy, both objectively and subjectively, of the technique ABDO-MG in the treatment of genuine stress urinary incontinence and mixed incontinence with stress predominance in women. Our data are encouraging, however long-term study with control group is warranted.