Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS · 2015
Fistula after single-stage primary hypospadias repair - A systematic review of the literature.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hardwicke J T, Bechar J A, Hodson J, Osmani O, Park A J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The reporting of fistula after hypospadias repair varies greatly in the worldwide literature, with incidence ranging from 0% to over 35%. With multiple techniques employed within a heterogeneous patient cohort, to date, no "average" incidence of fistula has been reported.
METHODS: A systematic review of the contemporary English-language literature from 2005 to 2015 identifying articles reporting complications after primary, single-stage hypospadias repair (the most commonly performed hypospadias operation) was performed. Identified reports were reviewed according to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) and the Methodological Index or Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS). A random effects analysis model was produced, in order to calculate a pooled outcome rates across the included studies. Separate models were then produced for subgroups of studies, with the resulting pooled rates compared.
RESULTS: After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 44 articles progressed to the final analysis. A total of 6603 patients were included. The incidence of fistula was 7.5% (95% CI: 5.8-9.4), stricture or stenosis 4.4% (95% CI: 3.1-5.8) and dehiscence 2.1% (95% CI: 1.3-3.1).
CONCLUSIONS: With pooled proportions of complications from over 6600 patients over a 10-year period, a standard may be set for outcomes after single-stage primary hypospadias repair for surgeons to audit their own outcomes against.
METHODS: A systematic review of the contemporary English-language literature from 2005 to 2015 identifying articles reporting complications after primary, single-stage hypospadias repair (the most commonly performed hypospadias operation) was performed. Identified reports were reviewed according to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) and the Methodological Index or Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS). A random effects analysis model was produced, in order to calculate a pooled outcome rates across the included studies. Separate models were then produced for subgroups of studies, with the resulting pooled rates compared.
RESULTS: After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 44 articles progressed to the final analysis. A total of 6603 patients were included. The incidence of fistula was 7.5% (95% CI: 5.8-9.4), stricture or stenosis 4.4% (95% CI: 3.1-5.8) and dehiscence 2.1% (95% CI: 1.3-3.1).
CONCLUSIONS: With pooled proportions of complications from over 6600 patients over a 10-year period, a standard may be set for outcomes after single-stage primary hypospadias repair for surgeons to audit their own outcomes against.