The Neurohospitalist · 2023
Evaluation of the Safety of Slow IV Push Versus Slow IV Infusion Administration of 23.4% Sodium Chloride.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Iskaros Olivia, Arnouk Serena, Papadopoulos John, Merchan Cristian
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Increased intracranial pressure due to cerebral edema is a medical emergency in which 23.4% sodium chloride (23.4% NaCl) may be a lifesaving intervention. Currently, safety data is limited on slow IV push (IVP) administration. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of IVP administration of 23.4% NaCl and determine the number of infusion-related adverse events (IRAEs) compared to slow IV infusion (SIV) administration.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients who received a dose of 23.4% NaCl at the (removed institution) from January 2015 to June 2020 as either SIV over 30 minutes or IVP over 2-5 minutes.
RESULTS: In total, 81 patients, 55 in the IVP group and 26 in the SIV group, were included in the analysis. There was a significantly faster time from order entry to dose completion (IVP 25 [13,58] vs SIV 73 [55,113] minutes, P < .001). There was no difference in IRAEs between the groups (IVP 17 [31%] vs SIV 6 [23%], P = .466). Hypotension was most common (IVP 13 [24%] vs SIV 5 [19%], P = .656) followed by bradycardia (IVP 6 [11%] vs SIV 1 [4%], P = .291). There were no extravasations reported.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, among a cohort of patients with cerebral edema, we found no difference in the incidence of IRAEs between SIV and IVP administration of 23.4% NaCl, and found a faster time to complete administration fssor the latter. In emergent scenarios where time may impact neurologic function, 23.4% NaCl administered IVP may be an alternative to SIV administration.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients who received a dose of 23.4% NaCl at the (removed institution) from January 2015 to June 2020 as either SIV over 30 minutes or IVP over 2-5 minutes.
RESULTS: In total, 81 patients, 55 in the IVP group and 26 in the SIV group, were included in the analysis. There was a significantly faster time from order entry to dose completion (IVP 25 [13,58] vs SIV 73 [55,113] minutes, P < .001). There was no difference in IRAEs between the groups (IVP 17 [31%] vs SIV 6 [23%], P = .466). Hypotension was most common (IVP 13 [24%] vs SIV 5 [19%], P = .656) followed by bradycardia (IVP 6 [11%] vs SIV 1 [4%], P = .291). There were no extravasations reported.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, among a cohort of patients with cerebral edema, we found no difference in the incidence of IRAEs between SIV and IVP administration of 23.4% NaCl, and found a faster time to complete administration fssor the latter. In emergent scenarios where time may impact neurologic function, 23.4% NaCl administered IVP may be an alternative to SIV administration.