MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1159/000346330

Медицинская библиотека · Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland) · 2013

Decrease recurrence rate of condylomata acuminata by photodynamic therapy combined with CO2 laser in mainland China: a meta-analysis.

Zhu Xiaoling, Chen Hongxiao, Cai Longfeng, Yu Zhiming, Cai Limin

СтатьяМетаанализПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Condylomata acuminata (CA) are caused by human papillomavirus. Most conventional therapies for CA have high recurrence rate.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the recurrence rate of 5-aminolaevulinic acid photodynamic therapy (ALA-PDT) combined with CO2 laser and CO2 laser alone for CA treatment in mainland China.

METHODS

In this meta-analysis, 2,048 cases of CA from 22 articles were divided into two groups. The treatment group was treated by using ALA-PDT combined with CO2 laser, and CO2 laser alone was applied in the control group. The recurrence rate of the two groups was calculated and compared.

RESULTS

The recurrence rate was 42.67% (451/1,057) in the control group and 10.29% (102/991) in the treatment group, with a significant statistical difference between the two groups (χ(2) = 271.98, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

ALA-PDT combined with CO2 laser was more effective in decreasing the recurrence rate of CA compared with CO2 laser alone. It might offer a wide clinical application for CA treatment.

Для цитирования: Zhu Xiaoling, Chen Hongxiao, Cai Longfeng, Yu Zhiming, Cai Limin. Decrease recurrence rate of condylomata acuminata by photodynamic therapy combined with CO2 laser in mainland China: a meta-analysis.. Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland). 2013. DOI: 10.1159/000346330.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.