DOI 10.1097/scs.0000000000004811
The Coexistence of Growth Hormone-Producing Pituitary Adenoma and Rathke Cleft Cyst: How Can We Diagnosis Preoperation?
Аннотация
Pituitary adenoma (PA) rarely coexists with Rathke's cleft cyst (RCC). Previously, only 13 cases of patients with growth hormone (GH)-producing PA and concomitant RCC have been reported. Here, the authors report a 54-year-old female patient with a GH-secreting PA coexisting with an RCC. Acromegaly was diagnosed according to the physical examination and endocrine data. Preoperatively, the coronal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contained 2 different signal intensities, these unusually MRI findings for the intrasellar mass were rarely. According to our clinical experience for diagnosis of PA and RCC, besides GH-producing PA in this case, but the possibility of concomitant RCC should be considered. One-and-a-half nostril endoscopic transsphenoidal approach was performed. Intraoperatively, the adenoma was successfully removed and a large amount of grayish fluid from the cyst was released. The endocrine testing was normal soon after the operation and the patient remained well for a follow-up period of 3 months. The postoperative MRI (obtained 3 months after surgery) showed no intrasellar and suprasellar mass. The authors retrospectively analyzed the all 14 cases of concomitant GH-secreting PAs and RCCs and summarized MRI characteristics. When preoperative MRI contained 2 different signal intensities, one mass lesion showed low or isointense signal on the T1-weighted and T2-weighted images, whereas the other lesion showed low signal on the T1-weighted images and hyperintense on the T2-weighted images, the collision MRI features may be helpful for the preoperative diagnosis of concomitant PAs and RCCs.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.