MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/13645700701825738

Медицинская библиотека · Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy · 2008

Should cystoscopy be routinely performed after laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy?

Ko Ma-Lee, Lin Hui-Wen, Chen Su-Chee, Pan Hun-Shan

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

This study was undertaken to determine the usefulness of routine intra-operative cystoscopy in documenting ureteral patency after laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH). There were eighty patients who underwent LAVH for benign tumors of the uterus (adenomyosis and myoma), uterine prolapse, persistent intraepithelial neoplasm of the cervix (CIN3) and cervical carcinoma in situ (CIS). Intra-operative cystoscopy with ureteral stenting was performed at the time of LAVH to evaluate the urinary tract. From among the 80 patients who underwent LAVH, 52 had myoma, 19 had adenomyosis, six patients had uterine prolapse, one had CIS and seven patients were diagnosed to have CIN3. Cystoscopy discovered one unsuspected bladder injury. Hematuria was the immediate complication caused by intraoperative cystoscopy. It was observed in ten patients. Urinary tract evaluation, including cystoscopy and ureteral stenting at the time of complex gynecologic surgery such as LAVH could be incorporated in the whole surgical procedure. It decreases morbidity associated with unrecognized injury.

Для цитирования: Ko Ma-Lee, Lin Hui-Wen, Chen Su-Chee, Pan Hun-Shan. Should cystoscopy be routinely performed after laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy?. Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy. 2008. DOI: 10.1080/13645700701825738.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.