MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/njcp.njcp_3_19

Медицинская библиотека · Nigerian journal of clinical practice · 2019

Selection of ideal pterygoid osteotome: A preliminary study.

Odabasi O, Moharamnejad N, Sahin O

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Pterygomaxillary separation is the most critical step of Le Fort I osteotomy. Nonideal separation of pterygomaxillary junction could be associated with many complications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the anatomic basis of proper pterygoid osteotome in Le Fort I surgery.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

The cone beam computed tomography image of 177 patients were evaluated retrospectively. To design an ideal osteotomy, the angle and the length of the posterior curvature of the maxillary sinus wall were measured. For the classification of the posterior angle as low, medium, and high, the category was based on upper and lower groups consisting of 27%, where the measurement and representability are at the maximum level.

RESULTS

The mean posterior length of three angle groups was as follows: low group: 7.81 mm, medium group: 7.54 mm, and high group: 7.41 mm. The differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). In addition, the posterior angle and length were evaluated according to the gender and the sides, and no statistically significant difference was found. (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Ideal osteotomy technique for pterygomaxillary disjunction and the avoidance of related complications could be achieved by selecting patient-specific osteotome using radiographic assessment.

Для цитирования: Odabasi O, Moharamnejad N, Sahin O. Selection of ideal pterygoid osteotome: A preliminary study.. Nigerian journal of clinical practice. 2019. DOI: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_3_19.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.