Medicina intensiva · 2022
Intermediate tidal volume is an acceptable option for ventilated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wu S-H, Kor C-T, Li C-Y, Hsiao Y-C
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Evidence only proves low surpasses high tidal volume (VT) for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Intermediate VT is a common setting for ARDS patients and has been demonstrated as effective as low VT in non-ARDS patients. The effectiveness of intermediate VT in ARDS has not been studied and is the objective of this study.
DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Five ICUs with their totally 130 beds in Taiwan.
PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS: ARDS patients under invasive ventilation.
INTERVENTIONS: No.
MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST: 28-D mortality.
RESULT: Totally 382 patients, with 6958 ventilator settings eligible for lung protection, were classified into low (mean VT=6.7ml/kg), intermediate (mean VT=8.9ml/kg) and high (mean VT=11.2ml/kg) VT groups. With similar baseline ARDS and ICU severities, intermediate and low VT groups did not differ in 28-D mortality (47% vs. 63%, P=0.06) or other outcomes such as 90-D mortality, ventilator-free days, ventilator-dependence rate. Multivariate analysis revealed high VT was independently associated with 28-D and 90-D mortality, but intermediate VT was not significantly associated with 28-D mortality (HR 1.34, CI 0.92-1.97, P=0.13) or 90-D mortality. When the intermediate and low VT groups were matched in propensity scores (n=66 for each group), their outcomes were also not significantly different.
CONCLUSION: Intermediate VT, with its outcomes similar to small VT, is an acceptable option for ventilated ARDS patients. This conclusion needs verification through clinical trials.
DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Five ICUs with their totally 130 beds in Taiwan.
PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS: ARDS patients under invasive ventilation.
INTERVENTIONS: No.
MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST: 28-D mortality.
RESULT: Totally 382 patients, with 6958 ventilator settings eligible for lung protection, were classified into low (mean VT=6.7ml/kg), intermediate (mean VT=8.9ml/kg) and high (mean VT=11.2ml/kg) VT groups. With similar baseline ARDS and ICU severities, intermediate and low VT groups did not differ in 28-D mortality (47% vs. 63%, P=0.06) or other outcomes such as 90-D mortality, ventilator-free days, ventilator-dependence rate. Multivariate analysis revealed high VT was independently associated with 28-D and 90-D mortality, but intermediate VT was not significantly associated with 28-D mortality (HR 1.34, CI 0.92-1.97, P=0.13) or 90-D mortality. When the intermediate and low VT groups were matched in propensity scores (n=66 for each group), their outcomes were also not significantly different.
CONCLUSION: Intermediate VT, with its outcomes similar to small VT, is an acceptable option for ventilated ARDS patients. This conclusion needs verification through clinical trials.