DOI 10.1007/s11548-020-02187-y
Evaluation of suturing performance in general surgery and ocular microsurgery by combining computer vision-based software and distributed fiber optic strain sensors: a proof-of-concept.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Improper suturing may cause an inadequate wound healing process and wound dehiscence as well as infection and even graft rejection in case of corneal transplantation. Hence, training surgeons in correct suturing procedures and objectively assessing their surgical skills is desirable.
METHODS
Two complementary methods for assessment of suturing skills in two medical fields (general surgery and ocular microsurgery) were demonstrated. Suturing quality is assessed by computer vision software. Evaluation of stitching flow of operation is based on measuring strain induced in an optical fiber that is placed in proximity to the wound and parallel thereto and is pressed and passed by wound stitches.
RESULTS
Our software generated a score for suturing outcome in both general surgery and ocular microsurgery when the stitching was done on a patch. Every trainee received a score in the range 0-100 that describes his/her performance. Strain values were recognized when using a patch in general surgery and a rubber patch in ocular microsurgery, but were less distinct in (disqualified) human cornea.
CONCLUSIONS
We proved a concept of an objective scoring method (based on various image processing algorithms) for assessment of suturing performance. It was also shown that fiber optic strain sensors are sensitive to the flow of stitching operation on a patch but are less sensitive to the flow of stitching operation on a human cornea. By combining these two methods, we can comprehensively evaluate the suturing performance objectively.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.