MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.07.236

Медицинская библиотека · World neurosurgery · 2019

Reversible Central Hypoventilation Syndrome in Basilar Invagination.

Mallepally Abhinandan Reddy, Karthik Yelamarthy, Ansari Neshar, Chhabra Harvinder Singh, Goel Shakti Amar

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

A noninvasive approach for basilar invagination (BI) and moreover, cervical traction to reduce odontoid invagination, has not been thoroughly described in the literature. We report a case of BI with Arnold-Chiari malformation in which preoperative reduction using Gardner well cervical traction was attempted and the patient developed central hypoventilation syndrome.

CASE DESCRIPTION: A 15-year-old boy presented with a 6-month history of progressive cervical myelopathy signs and symptoms, modified Japanese orthopedic association score 12 of 18. Radiology showed type A BI with occipitalization of atlas and a posterior arch defect of axis. A preoperative closed cervical traction followed by occipitocervical fusion via a posterior-only approach was planned. The patient developed 3 episodes of apnea on sleeping when on traction. Labeled as central hypoventilation, he was operated by foramen magnum decompression and occipitocervical fusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Cervical traction followed by posterior fixation is an effective way to manage basilar invagination with Arnold-Chiari malformation and assimilated C1. However, patients should be monitored closely for respiratory dysfunction.

Для цитирования: Mallepally Abhinandan Reddy, Karthik Yelamarthy, Ansari Neshar, Chhabra Harvinder Singh, Goel Shakti Amar. Reversible Central Hypoventilation Syndrome in Basilar Invagination.. World neurosurgery. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.07.236.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.