MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1590/s0004-282x2013000300009

Медицинская библиотека · Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2013

Quantitative sensory testing in trigeminal traumatic neuropathic pain and persistent idiopathic facial pain.

Siqueira Silvia R D T de, Siviero Mariana, Alvarez Fábio K, Teixeira Manoel J, Siqueira José T T de

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The objective of this article was to investigate, with a systematic protocol of quantitative sensory testing, patients with persistent idiopathic facial pain (PIFP) and others with trigeminal traumatic neuropathic pain (TTN) compared to controls. Thirty patients with PIFP, 19 with TTN, and 30 controls were evaluated on subjective numbness and dysesthesia and with a systematic protocol of quantitative sensory testing for thermal evaluation (cold and warm), mechanical detection (touch and pinpricks for mechanical pain), superficial pain thresholds, and corneal reflex. We found that PIFP and TTN had numbness and dysesthesia higher than controls (p<0.001 and p=0.003), and that in both of them mechanical pain by pinpricks detection was abnormal intra and extra orally at the mandibular branch (p<0.001). Cold, warm, and tactile detections and pain thresholds were similar among the groups. Corneal reflex was abnormal in TTN (p=0.005). This study supports neuropathic mechanisms involving pain processing in PIFP and that the criterion on absence of sensorial variations in PIFP should be revised.

Для цитирования: Siqueira Silvia R D T de, Siviero Mariana, Alvarez Fábio K, Teixeira Manoel J, Siqueira José T T de. Quantitative sensory testing in trigeminal traumatic neuropathic pain and persistent idiopathic facial pain.. Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria. 2013. DOI: 10.1590/s0004-282x2013000300009.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.