Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2019
Extended evaluation of the efficacy of a proactive forced oscillation technique-based auto-CPAP algorithm.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Herkenrath S D, Treml M, Anduleit N, Richter K, Pietzke-Calcagnile A, Schwaibold M, Schäfer R, Alshut R, Grimm A, Hagmeyer L, Randerath W J
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Previous studies revealed substantially varying therapy efficacy of automatic continuous positive airway pressure (APAP) devices in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). We evaluated the efficacy of a new APAP device using the forced oscillation technique (FOT) to evaluate upper airway obstruction during apneas and flow contour analyses during hypopneas.
METHODS: Forty-six initially diagnosed OSA patients were included and the pressure range was set from 5 to 20 hPa. Therapy efficacy was assessed based on the reduction of apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), improvement of objective sleep quality parameters, and the appropriateness of the device's pressure regulation.
RESULTS: AHI and arousal index significantly decreased during APAP therapy (median [interquartile range]: AHI 36 [23-55] vs. 2 [1-6]/h, arousal index 30 [22-45] vs. 15 [10-19]/h, both p < 0.001). The amount of slow wave sleep (SWS) and rapid-eye-movement (REM) sleep significantly increased (SWS 20 [14-29] vs. 29 [19-34]%, REM 16 [11-21] vs. 24 [14-30]%, both p < 0.01). Most residual respiratory events during therapy were of central etiology and attributable to five patients, who presented with treatment-emergent central sleep apnea. The device's pressure regulation abolished most obstructive respiratory events (n = 6.7 residual obstructive events per patient). Of central respiratory events, 534/646 (83%) did not lead to pressure increases.
CONCLUSION: This pilot study provides a proof of concept that the APAP device combining FOT and evaluation of flow contour allows for the suppression of obstructive events without relevant false reactions.
METHODS: Forty-six initially diagnosed OSA patients were included and the pressure range was set from 5 to 20 hPa. Therapy efficacy was assessed based on the reduction of apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), improvement of objective sleep quality parameters, and the appropriateness of the device's pressure regulation.
RESULTS: AHI and arousal index significantly decreased during APAP therapy (median [interquartile range]: AHI 36 [23-55] vs. 2 [1-6]/h, arousal index 30 [22-45] vs. 15 [10-19]/h, both p < 0.001). The amount of slow wave sleep (SWS) and rapid-eye-movement (REM) sleep significantly increased (SWS 20 [14-29] vs. 29 [19-34]%, REM 16 [11-21] vs. 24 [14-30]%, both p < 0.01). Most residual respiratory events during therapy were of central etiology and attributable to five patients, who presented with treatment-emergent central sleep apnea. The device's pressure regulation abolished most obstructive respiratory events (n = 6.7 residual obstructive events per patient). Of central respiratory events, 534/646 (83%) did not lead to pressure increases.
CONCLUSION: This pilot study provides a proof of concept that the APAP device combining FOT and evaluation of flow contour allows for the suppression of obstructive events without relevant false reactions.