Zhonghua yi xue za zhi · 2011
[Propofol target controlled infusion plus a low concentration of sevoflurane inhalation induction anesthesia for the removal of foreign body from tracheobronchus in children].
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhang Xu-tong, Qi Dan-si, Liu Hua-cheng, Su Er-zhan, Li Jun
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To explore the effects of propofol target controlled infusion (TCI) plus a low concentration of sevoflurane inhalation induction for the removal of tracheobronchial foreign body in children.
METHODS: After the approval of the hospital ethics committee, a total of 90 patients, aged 9 - 36 months old and weighted 8 - 17 kg, were randomly divided into 3 groups: group A, group B and group C. Propofol TCI plus a low concentration of sevoflurane inhalation induction was administered in group A while ketamine or fentanyl plus propofol TCI in group B or C respectively. Effects of anesthesia, complications and recovery durations were observed.
RESULTS: The incidence of severe breathholding and bucking during inserting bronchoscope was 1 case in group A, 7 in group B and 5 in group C. There were significant differences between groups A and B (P < 0.05). The minimal intra-operative SpO2 in group B or group C was lower than that in group A (P < 0.01). The cases for intra-operative SpO2 < 95% in group B or group C were more than that in group A (P < 0.01). And the maximal target concentration of propofol was significantly higher than that in group A (P < 0.01). Ten cases in group B had laryngeal stridor and dyspnea during inspirations post-operatively and occurred more frequently than those in group A or C (P < 0.01). As compared with group A and C, post-operative staying lengths and recovery durations were significantly longer in those in group B (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: Propofol TCI plus a low concentration of sevoflurane inhalation induction is both safe and practical for the controlled removal of tracheobronchial foreign body in children.
METHODS: After the approval of the hospital ethics committee, a total of 90 patients, aged 9 - 36 months old and weighted 8 - 17 kg, were randomly divided into 3 groups: group A, group B and group C. Propofol TCI plus a low concentration of sevoflurane inhalation induction was administered in group A while ketamine or fentanyl plus propofol TCI in group B or C respectively. Effects of anesthesia, complications and recovery durations were observed.
RESULTS: The incidence of severe breathholding and bucking during inserting bronchoscope was 1 case in group A, 7 in group B and 5 in group C. There were significant differences between groups A and B (P < 0.05). The minimal intra-operative SpO2 in group B or group C was lower than that in group A (P < 0.01). The cases for intra-operative SpO2 < 95% in group B or group C were more than that in group A (P < 0.01). And the maximal target concentration of propofol was significantly higher than that in group A (P < 0.01). Ten cases in group B had laryngeal stridor and dyspnea during inspirations post-operatively and occurred more frequently than those in group A or C (P < 0.01). As compared with group A and C, post-operative staying lengths and recovery durations were significantly longer in those in group B (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: Propofol TCI plus a low concentration of sevoflurane inhalation induction is both safe and practical for the controlled removal of tracheobronchial foreign body in children.