Biological psychiatry global open science · 2024
Identification of State Markers in Anorexia Nervosa: Replication and Extension of Inflammation-Associated Biomarkers Using Multiplex Profiling.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Breithaupt Lauren, Holsen Laura M, Ji Chunni, Hu Jie, Petterway Felicia, Rosa-Caldwell Megan, Nilsson Ida A K, Thomas Jennifer J, Williams Kyle A, Boutin Regine, Slattery Meghan, Bulik Cynthia M, Arnold Steven E, Lawson Elizabeth A, Misra Madhusmita, Eddy Kamryn T
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Proteomics offers potential for detecting and monitoring anorexia nervosa (AN) and its variant, atypical AN (atyp-AN). However, research has been limited by small protein panels, a focus on adult AN, and lack of replication.
METHODS: In this study, we performed Olink multiplex profiling of 92 inflammation-related proteins in females with AN/atyp-AN (n = 64), all of whom were ≤90% of expected body weight, and age-matched healthy control individuals (n = 44).
RESULTS: Five proteins differed significantly between the primary AN/atyp-AN group and the healthy control group (lower levels: HGF, IL-18R1, TRANCE; higher levels: CCL23, LIF-R). The expression levels of 3 proteins (lower IL-18R1, TRANCE; higher LIF-R) were uniquely disrupted in participants with AN in our primary model. No unique expression levels emerged for atyp-AN. In the total sample, 12 proteins (ADA, CD5, CD6, CXCL1, FGF-21, HGF, IL-12B, IL18, IL-18R1, SIRT2, TNFSF14, TRANCE) were positively correlated with body mass index and 5 proteins (CCL11, FGF-19, IL8, LIF-R, OPG) were negatively correlated with body mass index in our primary models.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results replicate the results of a previous study that demonstrated a dysregulated inflammatory status in AN and extend those results to atyp-AN. Of the 17 proteins correlated with body mass index, 11 were replicated from a previous study that used similar methods, highlighting the promise of inflammatory protein expression levels as biomarkers of AN disease monitoring. Our findings underscore the complexity of AN and atyp-AN by highlighting the inability of the identified proteins to differentiate between these 2 subtypes, thereby emphasizing the heterogeneous nature of these disorders.
METHODS: In this study, we performed Olink multiplex profiling of 92 inflammation-related proteins in females with AN/atyp-AN (n = 64), all of whom were ≤90% of expected body weight, and age-matched healthy control individuals (n = 44).
RESULTS: Five proteins differed significantly between the primary AN/atyp-AN group and the healthy control group (lower levels: HGF, IL-18R1, TRANCE; higher levels: CCL23, LIF-R). The expression levels of 3 proteins (lower IL-18R1, TRANCE; higher LIF-R) were uniquely disrupted in participants with AN in our primary model. No unique expression levels emerged for atyp-AN. In the total sample, 12 proteins (ADA, CD5, CD6, CXCL1, FGF-21, HGF, IL-12B, IL18, IL-18R1, SIRT2, TNFSF14, TRANCE) were positively correlated with body mass index and 5 proteins (CCL11, FGF-19, IL8, LIF-R, OPG) were negatively correlated with body mass index in our primary models.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results replicate the results of a previous study that demonstrated a dysregulated inflammatory status in AN and extend those results to atyp-AN. Of the 17 proteins correlated with body mass index, 11 were replicated from a previous study that used similar methods, highlighting the promise of inflammatory protein expression levels as biomarkers of AN disease monitoring. Our findings underscore the complexity of AN and atyp-AN by highlighting the inability of the identified proteins to differentiate between these 2 subtypes, thereby emphasizing the heterogeneous nature of these disorders.