DOI 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2024.0218
Potential treatment approaches for malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: in vivo and in vitro experimental study of natural killer cell immunotherapy.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare primary malignant tumor with an extremely poor prognosis that currently lacks effective treatment options. This study investigated the in vitro and in vivo efficacy of natural killer (NK) cells for treatment of MPM.
METHODS
An in vitro study was conducted to assess the cytotoxicity of NK cells from umbilical cord blood to MPM cells with the use of a high-content imaging analysis system, the Cell Counting Kit-8 assay, and Wright-Giemsa staining. The level of NK cell effector molecule expression was detected by flow cytometry and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. The ability of NK cells to kill MPM cells was determined based on live cell imaging, transmission electron microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. An in vivo study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of NK cell therapy based on the experimental peritoneal cancer index, small animal magnetic resonance imaging, and conventional histopathologic, cytologic, and hematologic studies.
RESULTS
NK cells effectively killed MPM cells through the release of effector molecules (granzyme B, perforin, interferon-γ, and tumor necrosis factor-α) in a dose- and density-dependent manner. The NK cell killing process potentially involved four dynamic steps: chemotaxis; hitting; adhesion; and penetration. NK cells significantly reduced the tumor burden, diminished ascites production, and extended survival with no significant hematologic toxicity or organ damage in NOG mice.
CONCLUSIONS
NK cell immunotherapy inhibited proliferation of MPM cells in vitro and in vivo with a good safety profile.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.