MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/ico.0b013e318166f4b7

Медицинская библиотека · Cornea · 2008

Conjunctival condylomata acuminata.

Iuorno Joseph, Truskinovsky Alexander, Chung Gary, Krachmer Jay, Bawcombe Drew, Huang Andrew

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To report a case of sexually transmitted conjunctival squamous papillomas and to propose a new term for this condition.

METHODS

We report a case of a 31-year-old white woman who presented with bilateral exuberant conjunctival papillomas. Her medical history included biopsy-proven human papillomavirus-induced genital warts, of which she was currently having a recurrence. We treated her eyes with topical a-interferon 2b.

RESULTS

After treatment, there was significant reduction of the conjunctival lesions. Tissue from a conjunctival lesion of her left eye showed a papillary squamous proliferation with delicated fibrovascular cores and acanthotic epithelium containing binucleate cells and koilocytes. Molecular testing confirmed the lesion to harbor human papillomavirus type 11.

CONCLUSIONS

The term "condylomata acuminata" typically refers to anogenital warts. From the similarities between the conjunctival lesions described in this patient and typical genital warts, it is our recommendation to refer to these lesions as conjunctival condylomata acuminata. This diagnostic term connotes a sexually transmitted etiology and should alert the health care provider to look for possible asymptomatic genital warts on the patient or the patient's sexual partner.

Для цитирования: Iuorno Joseph, Truskinovsky Alexander, Chung Gary, Krachmer Jay, Bawcombe Drew, Huang Andrew. Conjunctival condylomata acuminata.. Cornea. 2008. DOI: 10.1097/ico.0b013e318166f4b7.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.