MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2020.08.009

Медицинская библиотека · Cryobiology · 2020

Successful pregnancy following the transfer of re-vitrified twice-warmed embryos due to the forced cancellation of the primary FET: A case report.

Budani Maria Cristina, Tiboni Gian Mario

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Embryo cryopreservation represents a central procedure in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) programs. This report documents a Case of a successful pregnancy following the replacement of embryos that had to be re-vitrified due to the forced cancellation of the frozen embryo-transfer (FET).

PRINCIPLE

RESULTS

The 37- year-old patient was referred to our Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) unit for idiopathic infertility and recurrent implantation failures. The collection cycle resulted in 8 grade-A cleavage embryos (8-10 blastomeres), that were all vitrified to prevent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). The first frozen embryo transfer (FET) ended in a biochemical pregnancy and the second in an ectopic pregnancy. In the third attempt, three embryos were warmed but the provider could not complete the transfer due to cervical stenosis. The two surviving embryos were therefore re-vitrified. The final FET attempt, 4 months later, was successful and ended with the live birth of a healthy female baby.

CONCLUSIONS

The transfer of re-vitrified twice-warmed embryos may represent a possible option when embryo transfer cannot be performed.

Для цитирования: Budani Maria Cristina, Tiboni Gian Mario. Successful pregnancy following the transfer of re-vitrified twice-warmed embryos due to the forced cancellation of the primary FET: A case report.. Cryobiology. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2020.08.009.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.