JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition · 2019
Impact of Gastrostomy Tube Placement on Short-Term Weight Gain in Hospitalized Premature Infants.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Puia-Dumitrescu Mihai, Benjamin Daniel K, Smith P Brian, Greenberg Rachel G, Abuzaid Nada, Andrews Winsome, Chellani Kris, Gupta Anjali, Price Douglas, Williams Ciara, Malcolm William F, Clark Reese H, Zimmerman Kanecia O
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Gastrostomy tube (G-tube) placement is a long-term alternative to oral or nasogastric feeding for premature infants who cannot safely feed orally or need supplemental nutrition for adequate growth.
METHODS: We compared daily weight changes for G-tube infants 14 and 30 days preplacement and postplacement, excluding the first 7 days post-G-tube insertion. Infants <37 weeks of gestation without major congenital anomalies and discharged from 327 United States neonatal intensive care units (2004-2013) were included. Incidence of in-hospital outcomes including hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, intraventricular hemorrhage grade 3 or 4, necrotizing enterocolitis, and patent ductus arteriosus ligation was examined. Additionally, we estimated a treatment effect model in which infants with a G-tube were matched 1:1 to untreated controls based on propensity scores; main outcome was the average treatment effect (weight gain) for treated infants during the 7, 14, or 30 days immediately prior to discharge.
RESULTS: Of 329,254 infants, 1393 (0.4%) received a G-tube, increasing from 0.2% in 2004 to 0.6% in 2013. Daily weight gain was significantly less during days 8-14 postplacement compared with 14 days preplacement but was similar between 30 days preplacement and 8-30 days postplacement. After matching, G-tube infant weight gain during the 7 days predischarge was less than among controls, but there was no difference in weight gain between treated and control patients for 14 days and 30 days predischarge.
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of G-tube placement has increased. G-tube use in infants was not associated with improved short-term daily weight gain.
METHODS: We compared daily weight changes for G-tube infants 14 and 30 days preplacement and postplacement, excluding the first 7 days post-G-tube insertion. Infants <37 weeks of gestation without major congenital anomalies and discharged from 327 United States neonatal intensive care units (2004-2013) were included. Incidence of in-hospital outcomes including hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, intraventricular hemorrhage grade 3 or 4, necrotizing enterocolitis, and patent ductus arteriosus ligation was examined. Additionally, we estimated a treatment effect model in which infants with a G-tube were matched 1:1 to untreated controls based on propensity scores; main outcome was the average treatment effect (weight gain) for treated infants during the 7, 14, or 30 days immediately prior to discharge.
RESULTS: Of 329,254 infants, 1393 (0.4%) received a G-tube, increasing from 0.2% in 2004 to 0.6% in 2013. Daily weight gain was significantly less during days 8-14 postplacement compared with 14 days preplacement but was similar between 30 days preplacement and 8-30 days postplacement. After matching, G-tube infant weight gain during the 7 days predischarge was less than among controls, but there was no difference in weight gain between treated and control patients for 14 days and 30 days predischarge.
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of G-tube placement has increased. G-tube use in infants was not associated with improved short-term daily weight gain.