Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2001
[Side-fire laser coagulation of the prostate with the neodymium:YAG-laser. Long-term outcome].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Reek C, Conrad S, Heinzer H, Huland H
Аннотация
Transurethral laser prostatectomy has been widely used in patients with benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) with good short-term results and an excellent safety profile. We investigated how stable the results of side-firing visual laser coagulation of the prostate are during long-term follow-up to evaluate whether laser prostatectomy can really be an alternative to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Between January 1993 and December 1995 a total of 59 patients underwent visual transurethral side-firing laser coagulation of the prostate (Urolase, Bard Inc., Murray Hill, NJ, USA). The patients were monitored at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and then reevaluated after a mean of 33 months. As expected, at the 1-year follow-up there was a significant improvement in peak flow rate, post-void residual urine, international prostate symptom score (IPSS) and quality of life index (QoL). After a mean of 33 months, 15% of the patients required reoperation due to persistent BPO. In the remaining patients, peak flow rate and post-void residual urine were stable. However, the QoL index increased during long-term follow-up and no longer differed from the preoperative value after 33 months. The side-firing laser coagulation of the prostate does not seem to be a sufficient therapeutic alternative to TURP in the treatment of BPO.