Foot and ankle surgery : official journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons · 2016
Inter-observer agreement of the Wagner, University of Texas and PEDIS classification systems for the diabetic foot syndrome.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bravo-Molina Alejandra, Linares-Palomino José Patricio, Vera-Arroyo Blanca, Salmerón-Febres Luis Miguel, Ros-Díe Eduardo
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The aim of this cohort study was to assess the inter-observer agreement of three diabetic foot classification systems: the Wagner, the University of Texas and the PEDIS.
METHODS: We included 250 consecutive patients diagnosed of diabetic foot syndrome in 2009-2013. Wound scores were recorded at admission and a reevaluation was performed simultaneously or 24h later by a different evaluator. Demographical, laboratory data and associated risk factors were obtained from the patients' medical records.
RESULTS: The Kappa coefficient showed a moderate inter-observer agreement between the first evaluation and the reevaluation for Wagner scale (Kappa=0.55; 95% CI: 0.507-0.593), University of Texas scale (Kappa=0.513; 95% CI: 0.463-0.563) and for PEDIS scale (Kappa=0.574; 95% CI: 0.522-0.626).
CONCLUSIONS: This moderate agreement shows that these scales should not be used alone for management decisions regarding diabetic foot syndrome and should, therefore, be integrated with other clinical data to ensure an adequate handover.
METHODS: We included 250 consecutive patients diagnosed of diabetic foot syndrome in 2009-2013. Wound scores were recorded at admission and a reevaluation was performed simultaneously or 24h later by a different evaluator. Demographical, laboratory data and associated risk factors were obtained from the patients' medical records.
RESULTS: The Kappa coefficient showed a moderate inter-observer agreement between the first evaluation and the reevaluation for Wagner scale (Kappa=0.55; 95% CI: 0.507-0.593), University of Texas scale (Kappa=0.513; 95% CI: 0.463-0.563) and for PEDIS scale (Kappa=0.574; 95% CI: 0.522-0.626).
CONCLUSIONS: This moderate agreement shows that these scales should not be used alone for management decisions regarding diabetic foot syndrome and should, therefore, be integrated with other clinical data to ensure an adequate handover.