Multiple sclerosis and related disorders · 2026
Psychometric validation of PROMIS-Fatigue-MS-8a and MSIS-29v2 questionnaires in relapsing multiple sclerosis participants enrolled in a phase 2 trial of frexalimab.
СтатьяКлиническое исследование II фазыВалидационное исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Vermersch Patrick, Araujo Lita, Gourlain Samuel, Hakimi-Hawken Natalia, Saubadu Stephane, Truffinet Philippe, Arnould Benoit, Msihid Jerome
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: There are limited psychometric studies conducted using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Adult Short Form-Fatigue-Multiple Sclerosis 8a (PROMIS-Fatigue-MS-8a) and Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 version 2 (MSIS-29v2) questionnaires.
METHODS: Data were collected from a phase 2 trial (NCT04879628) investigating frexalimab in adults with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). Reliability, convergent validity, construct validity, and sensitivity to change were assessed on PROMIS-Fatigue-MS-8a and MSIS-29v2 using Cronbach's alpha coefficient, intraclass correlation coefficient, Spearman's or polyserial correlation coefficients, analysis of variance, and analysis of covariance, respectively. Analyses were conducted using baseline and Week 12 data from pooled treatment arms.
RESULTS: Item-to-item correlations were acceptable (0.4-0.9) for most of the items for both patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at baseline and Week 12. Internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach's alpha >0.90) for both PROs at baseline and Week 12. Additionally, good test-retest reliability was observed for PROMIS-Fatigue-MS-8a and the physical and psychological domains of MSIS-29v2. Convergent validity was supported by high correlations (r>0.50) between the PROMIS-Fatigue-MS-8a T-score and the MSIS-29v2 and the Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS)-Fatigue at baseline and Week 12. Construct validity was supported by significant differences between groups defined by the PGIS-Fatigue scores at baseline and Week 12 for both PROs (p<0.0001). Sensitivity to change was demonstrated by statistically significant differences in the mean change from baseline at Week 12 among groups defined by the PGIS-Fatigue and the Patient Global Impression of Change-Fatigue.
CONCLUSIONS: PROMIS-Fatigue-MS-8a and MSIS-29v2 are valid and reliable measures for evaluating treatment benefits in clinical trials of RMS.
METHODS: Data were collected from a phase 2 trial (NCT04879628) investigating frexalimab in adults with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). Reliability, convergent validity, construct validity, and sensitivity to change were assessed on PROMIS-Fatigue-MS-8a and MSIS-29v2 using Cronbach's alpha coefficient, intraclass correlation coefficient, Spearman's or polyserial correlation coefficients, analysis of variance, and analysis of covariance, respectively. Analyses were conducted using baseline and Week 12 data from pooled treatment arms.
RESULTS: Item-to-item correlations were acceptable (0.4-0.9) for most of the items for both patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at baseline and Week 12. Internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach's alpha >0.90) for both PROs at baseline and Week 12. Additionally, good test-retest reliability was observed for PROMIS-Fatigue-MS-8a and the physical and psychological domains of MSIS-29v2. Convergent validity was supported by high correlations (r>0.50) between the PROMIS-Fatigue-MS-8a T-score and the MSIS-29v2 and the Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS)-Fatigue at baseline and Week 12. Construct validity was supported by significant differences between groups defined by the PGIS-Fatigue scores at baseline and Week 12 for both PROs (p<0.0001). Sensitivity to change was demonstrated by statistically significant differences in the mean change from baseline at Week 12 among groups defined by the PGIS-Fatigue and the Patient Global Impression of Change-Fatigue.
CONCLUSIONS: PROMIS-Fatigue-MS-8a and MSIS-29v2 are valid and reliable measures for evaluating treatment benefits in clinical trials of RMS.