International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026
Harmful incidents following gynaecological ambulatory surgery: A scoping review.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Thoen Cathrine Ween, Glette Malin Knutsen, Wiig Siri, Danielsson Kim Christian, Bentsen Signe Berit
Аннотация
AIM: To map the types and frequencies of harmful incidents identified in research to occur following gynaecological ambulatory surgery.
DESIGN AND METHODS: A scoping review was conducted using the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis.
DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Scopus and Web of Science was searched for records published from inception to February of 2025.
RESULTS: Forty-one studies were included. Most of the harmful incidents identified to have occurred following gynaecological ambulatory surgery were mapped as physiological harm, including postoperative infections, bleeding and pain. The only harmful incident pertaining to other dimensions of harm was anxiety, which was mapped as psychological harm.
CONCLUSION: In this scoping review, all except one of the identified and mapped harmful incidents resulted from the physiological impact and tissue damage of undergoing surgical treatment. Anxiety was the only psychological harm identified to have occurred following gynaecological ambulatory surgery. No social harmful incidents were identified from the included studies.
PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: The Open Science Framework; https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VD6CB.
DESIGN AND METHODS: A scoping review was conducted using the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis.
DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Scopus and Web of Science was searched for records published from inception to February of 2025.
RESULTS: Forty-one studies were included. Most of the harmful incidents identified to have occurred following gynaecological ambulatory surgery were mapped as physiological harm, including postoperative infections, bleeding and pain. The only harmful incident pertaining to other dimensions of harm was anxiety, which was mapped as psychological harm.
CONCLUSION: In this scoping review, all except one of the identified and mapped harmful incidents resulted from the physiological impact and tissue damage of undergoing surgical treatment. Anxiety was the only psychological harm identified to have occurred following gynaecological ambulatory surgery. No social harmful incidents were identified from the included studies.
PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: The Open Science Framework; https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VD6CB.