The Annals of thoracic surgery · 2015
Midterm Follow-Up After Biventricular Repair of the Hypoplastic Left Heart Complex.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Freund Jan Erik, den Dekker Martijn H T, Blank A Christian, Haas Felix, Freund Matthias W
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: In neonates with hypoplastic left heart complex (HLHC), biventricular repair is considered superior to univentricular repair. The Z-scores of the mitral and the aortic valve annulus are primary factors for the choice of repair. Predictive cutoff values for the feasibility and optimal outcome of biventricular repair are unknown. This study assesses the growth of left side heart structures and the midterm outcome after biventricular repair with an interatrial fenestration in our HLHC population.
METHODS: Retrospective study of 19 HLHC patients who underwent biventricular repair in a single tertiary referral center between 2004 and 2013. The cardiac dimensions (mitral and aortic valve annulus, left ventricle inlet length, left ventricular internal diastolic dimension) were measured before and at 6, 12, 24, and 48 months after biventricular repair.
RESULTS: The follow-up ranged from 2 to 98 months. There was no early mortality, and the midterm survival rate was 95%. One patient died of a noncardiac- and nonintervention-related cause. Seven patients (37%) required a total of 8 reinterventions because of recurring or residual obstructive lesions. After biventricular repair, the left cardiac structures grew significantly.
CONCLUSIONS: Neonatal biventricular repair is successful and safe in HLHC patients, even with preoperative mitral and aortic valve annulus Z-scores of -4.5 and -5.5, respectively. Residual or restenosis required reintervention in 37% of our HLHC population, but was not significantly correlated with the magnitude of the preoperative Z-scores. Within the first 6 months of follow-up, the Z-scores almost normalized.
METHODS: Retrospective study of 19 HLHC patients who underwent biventricular repair in a single tertiary referral center between 2004 and 2013. The cardiac dimensions (mitral and aortic valve annulus, left ventricle inlet length, left ventricular internal diastolic dimension) were measured before and at 6, 12, 24, and 48 months after biventricular repair.
RESULTS: The follow-up ranged from 2 to 98 months. There was no early mortality, and the midterm survival rate was 95%. One patient died of a noncardiac- and nonintervention-related cause. Seven patients (37%) required a total of 8 reinterventions because of recurring or residual obstructive lesions. After biventricular repair, the left cardiac structures grew significantly.
CONCLUSIONS: Neonatal biventricular repair is successful and safe in HLHC patients, even with preoperative mitral and aortic valve annulus Z-scores of -4.5 and -5.5, respectively. Residual or restenosis required reintervention in 37% of our HLHC population, but was not significantly correlated with the magnitude of the preoperative Z-scores. Within the first 6 months of follow-up, the Z-scores almost normalized.