Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico · 2013
Evaluation of blood pressure measurements in first ambulatory neurological consultations: a missed part of the physical examination?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Vargas-Sánchez Angel, Chiquete Erwin, López-Corrales Gabriela E, Carrillo-Loza Karina, Núñez-Velasco Santiago, Ramírez-Ochoa Sol, Ochoa-Guzmán Ana, Ruiz-Sandoval José L
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To obtain a blood pressure reading is mandatory during either the general or specialized physical examination. This study describes factors associated with the accomplishment of blood pressure measurement in the first neurological consultation.
METHODS: We studied first ambulatory neurology consultations in a Mexican referral hospital. Demographic characteristics, diagnostic category of referral, final diagnosis and data on physical examination were collected to establish a logistic regression analysis in order to identify factors associated with the accomplishment of blood pressure measurement.
RESULTS: Over 8 months 778 outpatients were studied. The most frequent diagnoses for first consultation were headache (26%), epilepsy (14%) and stroke (13%). Only in 39% (n=301) of the outpatients blood pressure was registered, among them, 30% had normal blood pressure, 43% had 121-139/81-89 mmHg, 20% had 140-159/90-99 mmHg and 7% had ≥ 160/100 mmHg. The independent factors that favored the practice of BP determination in multivariable analysis were >65 years of age (odds ratio: 2.26; 95% confidence interval: 1.52-3.36) and headache complaint (odds ratio: 1.81, 95% confidence interval: 1.30-2.53). Notably, only 43% of patients with stroke had blood pressure registration, even when these stroke patients had blood pressure readings, they had higher blood pressure than with other diagnoses (p<0.05).
CONCLUSION: Blood pressure registration was frequently omitted from the first neurological consultation, particularly in outpatients who might need it the most.
METHODS: We studied first ambulatory neurology consultations in a Mexican referral hospital. Demographic characteristics, diagnostic category of referral, final diagnosis and data on physical examination were collected to establish a logistic regression analysis in order to identify factors associated with the accomplishment of blood pressure measurement.
RESULTS: Over 8 months 778 outpatients were studied. The most frequent diagnoses for first consultation were headache (26%), epilepsy (14%) and stroke (13%). Only in 39% (n=301) of the outpatients blood pressure was registered, among them, 30% had normal blood pressure, 43% had 121-139/81-89 mmHg, 20% had 140-159/90-99 mmHg and 7% had ≥ 160/100 mmHg. The independent factors that favored the practice of BP determination in multivariable analysis were >65 years of age (odds ratio: 2.26; 95% confidence interval: 1.52-3.36) and headache complaint (odds ratio: 1.81, 95% confidence interval: 1.30-2.53). Notably, only 43% of patients with stroke had blood pressure registration, even when these stroke patients had blood pressure readings, they had higher blood pressure than with other diagnoses (p<0.05).
CONCLUSION: Blood pressure registration was frequently omitted from the first neurological consultation, particularly in outpatients who might need it the most.