MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/ede.0000000000001404

Медицинская библиотека · Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2021

Prescription Opioid Laws and Opioid Dispensing in US Counties: Identifying Salient Law Provisions With Machine Learning.

Martins Silvia S, Bruzelius Emilie, Stingone Jeanette A, Wheeler-Martin Katherine, Akbarnejad Hanane, Mauro Christine M, Marziali Megan E, Samples Hillary, Crystal Stephen, Davis Corey S, Rudolph Kara E, Keyes Katherine M, Hasin Deborah S, Cerdá Magdalena

СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАVideo-Audio MediaПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Hundreds of laws aimed at reducing inappropriate prescription opioid dispensing have been implemented in the United States, yet heterogeneity in provisions and their simultaneous implementation have complicated evaluation of impacts. We apply a hypothesis-generating, multistage, machine-learning approach to identify salient law provisions and combinations associated with dispensing rates to test in future research.

METHODS

Using 162 prescription opioid law provisions capturing prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP) access, reporting and administration features, pain management clinic provisions, and prescription opioid limits, we used regularization approaches and random forest models to identify laws most predictive of county-level and high-dose dispensing. We stratified analyses by overdose epidemic phases-the prescription opioid phase (2006-2009), heroin phase (2010-2012), and fentanyl phase (2013-2016)-to further explore pattern shifts over time.

RESULTS

PDMP patient data access provisions most consistently predicted high-dispensing and high-dose dispensing counties. Pain management clinic-related provisions did not generally predict dispensing measures in the prescription opioid phase but became more discriminant of high dispensing and high-dose dispensing counties over time, especially in the fentanyl period. Predictive performance across models was poor, suggesting prescription opioid laws alone do not strongly predict dispensing.

CONCLUSIONS

Our systematic analysis of 162 law provisions identified patient data access and several pain management clinic provisions as predictive of county prescription opioid dispensing patterns. Future research employing other types of study designs is needed to test these provisions' causal relationships with inappropriate dispensing and to examine potential interactions between PDMP access and pain management clinic provisions. See video abstract at, http://links.lww.com/EDE/B861.

Для цитирования: Martins Silvia S, Bruzelius Emilie, Stingone Jeanette A, Wheeler-Martin Katherine, Akbarnejad Hanane, Mauro Christine M, Marziali Megan E, Samples Hillary, Crystal Stephen, Davis Corey S, Rudolph Kara E, Keyes Katherine M, Hasin Deborah S, Cerdá Magdalena. Prescription Opioid Laws and Opioid Dispensing in US Counties: Identifying Salient Law Provisions With Machine Learning.. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.). 2021. DOI: 10.1097/ede.0000000000001404.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.