MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.fas.2017.08.001

Медицинская библиотека · Foot and ankle surgery : official journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons · 2017

To compare the efficacy between fixation with tightrope and screw in the treatment of syndesmotic injuries: A meta-analysis.

Chen BaiHang, Chen Chao, Yang ZeTian, Huang PeiZhen, Dong Hang, Zeng ZhanPeng

СтатьяМетаанализОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

To compare the efficacy between fixation with suture-button and screw in the treatment of syndesmotic injuries: a meta-analysis.

METHODS

We comprehensively searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library and performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective comparative studies (RTCs). We performed using Review Manager 5.2.

RESULTS

Three RCTs and six retrospective studies were conducted, including a total of 397 patients. The significant differences of the fixation of suture-button were reported for AOFAS scores (at 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up), full-weight time, reoperation, malreduction and the rate of failure of fixation. There were no significant differences between the groups regarding complications of infection, VAS, OMAS, range of motion, TFCS, TFO and MCS.

CONCLUSIONS

Neither the functional outcome nor complications significantly differed between the fixation methods, but suture-button might lead to a quicker return to work. This analysis needs to be confirmed and updated by larger sample data and rigorously designed RCTs.

Для цитирования: Chen BaiHang, Chen Chao, Yang ZeTian, Huang PeiZhen, Dong Hang, Zeng ZhanPeng. To compare the efficacy between fixation with tightrope and screw in the treatment of syndesmotic injuries: A meta-analysis.. Foot and ankle surgery : official journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2017.08.001.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.