The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses · 2013
Significant practice pattern variations associated with intracranial pressure monitoring.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Olson DaiWai M, Lewis Lisa S, Bader Mary Kay, Bautista Cynthia, Malloy Rachel, Riemen Kristina E, McNett Molly M
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to describe nursing practice in the care of patients with intracranial pressure monitoring. Although standards for care of such patients have been established, there continue to be variations in the nursing practice.
METHODS: This was an observational study in which data were collected from 28 nurse-patient dyads at 16 different hospitals across the United States. Each dyad was observed for 2 hours; nursing actions and patient responses including intracranial pressure readings were documented.
RESULTS: Differences in the care of patients with intracranial pressure monitoring were prevalent. Variations in practice were prompted by healthcare provider prescriptions as well as nursing decisions. Prescriptions and interventions were often not supported by the available scientific evidence.
VIDEO ABSTRACT: For more insights from the authors, see Supplemental Digital Content 1, at http://links.lww.com/JNN/A7.
METHODS: This was an observational study in which data were collected from 28 nurse-patient dyads at 16 different hospitals across the United States. Each dyad was observed for 2 hours; nursing actions and patient responses including intracranial pressure readings were documented.
RESULTS: Differences in the care of patients with intracranial pressure monitoring were prevalent. Variations in practice were prompted by healthcare provider prescriptions as well as nursing decisions. Prescriptions and interventions were often not supported by the available scientific evidence.
VIDEO ABSTRACT: For more insights from the authors, see Supplemental Digital Content 1, at http://links.lww.com/JNN/A7.