MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/jnn.0b013e3182986400

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses · 2013

Significant practice pattern variations associated with intracranial pressure monitoring.

Olson DaiWai M, Lewis Lisa S, Bader Mary Kay, Bautista Cynthia, Malloy Rachel, Riemen Kristina E, McNett Molly M

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНаблюдательное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to describe nursing practice in the care of patients with intracranial pressure monitoring. Although standards for care of such patients have been established, there continue to be variations in the nursing practice.

METHODS

This was an observational study in which data were collected from 28 nurse-patient dyads at 16 different hospitals across the United States. Each dyad was observed for 2 hours; nursing actions and patient responses including intracranial pressure readings were documented.

RESULTS

Differences in the care of patients with intracranial pressure monitoring were prevalent. Variations in practice were prompted by healthcare provider prescriptions as well as nursing decisions. Prescriptions and interventions were often not supported by the available scientific evidence.

VIDEO ABSTRACT: For more insights from the authors, see Supplemental Digital Content 1, at http://links.lww.com/JNN/A7.

Для цитирования: Olson DaiWai M, Lewis Lisa S, Bader Mary Kay, Bautista Cynthia, Malloy Rachel, Riemen Kristina E, McNett Molly M. Significant practice pattern variations associated with intracranial pressure monitoring.. The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses. 2013. DOI: 10.1097/jnn.0b013e3182986400.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.