Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs · 2025
Population-Level Evidence That Alcohol Brief Interventions Improve Drinking and Blood Pressure Outcomes in Patients With Hypertension and Unhealthy Alcohol Use.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sterling Stacy A, Palzes Vanessa A, Lu Yun, Kline-Simon Andrea H, Ross Thekla B, Weisner Constance M, Elson Joseph, Satre Derek D, Awsare Sameer, Asyyed Asma, Rana Jamal, Campbell Cynthia I, Metz Verena E, Chi Felicia W
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Hypertension is highly prevalent in primary care. Unhealthy alcohol use can impact its management and associated cardiovascular disease risks. Alcohol screening and brief intervention (ASBI) in primary care is effective for early intervention for unhealthy use, yet its effectiveness in heterogeneous populations in real-world settings remains unclear. Using electronic health records, we emulated a pragmatic clinical trial to evaluate the effects of receiving ASBI on drinking and blood pressure (BP) outcomes among primary care patients with hypertension and unhealthy alcohol use.
METHOD: This observational study identified 72,979 patients with hypertension who screened positive for unhealthy drinking between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2017. We used a target trial framework to compare the effects of receiving ASBI (intervention) to not receiving brief intervention (comparison) on drinking (change in heavy drinking days and drinks/week) and BP outcomes (changes in diastolic and systolic BP) from baseline to 2- and 5-year follow-ups. Treatment effect estimates were obtained using inverse probability-weighted models.
RESULTS: At 2 years, the intervention condition had about 0.2 fewer heavy drinking days and about 0.1 fewer drinks/week than the comparison condition. The intervention condition had an additional 0.5 mmHg and 0.7 mmHg decline in diastolic and systolic BP, and 8% and 6% higher odds of having a ≥3 mmHg reduction in diastolic and systolic BP, respectively, than the comparison condition. Between-group differences in both outcomes diminished at 5 years.
CONCLUSIONS: The modest changes in drinking and BP we found contribute to the emerging evidence that brief intervention may benefit broader health outcomes at the population level.
METHOD: This observational study identified 72,979 patients with hypertension who screened positive for unhealthy drinking between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2017. We used a target trial framework to compare the effects of receiving ASBI (intervention) to not receiving brief intervention (comparison) on drinking (change in heavy drinking days and drinks/week) and BP outcomes (changes in diastolic and systolic BP) from baseline to 2- and 5-year follow-ups. Treatment effect estimates were obtained using inverse probability-weighted models.
RESULTS: At 2 years, the intervention condition had about 0.2 fewer heavy drinking days and about 0.1 fewer drinks/week than the comparison condition. The intervention condition had an additional 0.5 mmHg and 0.7 mmHg decline in diastolic and systolic BP, and 8% and 6% higher odds of having a ≥3 mmHg reduction in diastolic and systolic BP, respectively, than the comparison condition. Between-group differences in both outcomes diminished at 5 years.
CONCLUSIONS: The modest changes in drinking and BP we found contribute to the emerging evidence that brief intervention may benefit broader health outcomes at the population level.