Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology · 1997
Age and anorectal sensibility in normal women.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ryhammer A M, Laurberg S, Bek K M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Our aim was to study associations between age and anorectal sensibility in healthy women.
METHODS: Seventy-five women, with a mean age of 50 (range, 20-83) years, and mean parity of 2 (range, 0-4), were studied. Anal mucosa electrosensitivity (AME) was measured 1 and 2 cm from the anal verge. Rectal sensibility was also measured (minimum perceived volume (MPV), desire to defaecate (DD), and urgency (U)). Associations between anorectal sensibility and age were corrected for parity by using multiple regression analysis.
RESULTS: Threshold values of AME increased with age (P = 0.03) (1 cm) and P = 0.01 (2 cm)). Rectal sensibility threshold values were also positively associated with age (MPV, P = 0.003; DD, P = 0.04; and U, P = 0.06). Changes in AME were greater after menopause, whereas associations between rectal sensibility and age seemed linear.
CONCLUSION: Impairment of the anorectal sensibility appears to be part of the normal ageing process, thus increasing the risk of faecal incontinence in old women.
METHODS: Seventy-five women, with a mean age of 50 (range, 20-83) years, and mean parity of 2 (range, 0-4), were studied. Anal mucosa electrosensitivity (AME) was measured 1 and 2 cm from the anal verge. Rectal sensibility was also measured (minimum perceived volume (MPV), desire to defaecate (DD), and urgency (U)). Associations between anorectal sensibility and age were corrected for parity by using multiple regression analysis.
RESULTS: Threshold values of AME increased with age (P = 0.03) (1 cm) and P = 0.01 (2 cm)). Rectal sensibility threshold values were also positively associated with age (MPV, P = 0.003; DD, P = 0.04; and U, P = 0.06). Changes in AME were greater after menopause, whereas associations between rectal sensibility and age seemed linear.
CONCLUSION: Impairment of the anorectal sensibility appears to be part of the normal ageing process, thus increasing the risk of faecal incontinence in old women.