The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2015
Vaginal misoprostol versus intravenous oxytocin for the management of second-trimester pregnancies with intrauterine fetal death: A randomized clinical trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Abediasl Zhila, Sheikh Mahdi, Pooransari Parichehr, Farahani Zahra, Kalani Farah
Аннотация
AIM: The aim of this study was to compare vaginal misoprostol versus intravenous (i.v.) oxytocin in the management of pregnancies with second-trimester intrauterine fetal death (IUFD).
METHODS: This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 85 pregnant women with IUFD and unripe cervix who were admitted for labor induction. Forty were randomly allocated to receive 200 mcg vaginal misoprostol every 12 h, and 45 were randomly assigned to receive high-dose i.v. oxytocin (starting from 6 mU/min to reach the maximum dose of 40 mU/min). This study is registered at www.irct.ir (IRCT201307159568N5).
RESULTS: The induction-to-delivery interval in the misoprostol group (10.5 ± 5.3 [range 4-27] h) was significantly lower than that in the oxytocin group (14 ± 6.8 [range 4-30] h) (P = 0.009). The total hospital stay in the misoprostol group (22.6 ± 9.5 [range 12-48] h) was significantly lower than that in the oxytocin group (35.3 ± 16.4 [range 12-72] h) (P = 0.000). Although the successful induction rate was higher in the misoprostol group, this was not significant (95% vs 86.7%, P = 0.1). Placenta retention occurred more in the oxytocin group (20% vs 5%, P = 0.03).
CONCLUSION: Both vaginal misoprostol and high-dose i.v. oxytocin are highly effective in labor induction in second-trimester pregnancies with IUFD and an unripe cervix. However, vaginal misoprostol seems to be superior to i.v. oxytocin.
METHODS: This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 85 pregnant women with IUFD and unripe cervix who were admitted for labor induction. Forty were randomly allocated to receive 200 mcg vaginal misoprostol every 12 h, and 45 were randomly assigned to receive high-dose i.v. oxytocin (starting from 6 mU/min to reach the maximum dose of 40 mU/min). This study is registered at www.irct.ir (IRCT201307159568N5).
RESULTS: The induction-to-delivery interval in the misoprostol group (10.5 ± 5.3 [range 4-27] h) was significantly lower than that in the oxytocin group (14 ± 6.8 [range 4-30] h) (P = 0.009). The total hospital stay in the misoprostol group (22.6 ± 9.5 [range 12-48] h) was significantly lower than that in the oxytocin group (35.3 ± 16.4 [range 12-72] h) (P = 0.000). Although the successful induction rate was higher in the misoprostol group, this was not significant (95% vs 86.7%, P = 0.1). Placenta retention occurred more in the oxytocin group (20% vs 5%, P = 0.03).
CONCLUSION: Both vaginal misoprostol and high-dose i.v. oxytocin are highly effective in labor induction in second-trimester pregnancies with IUFD and an unripe cervix. However, vaginal misoprostol seems to be superior to i.v. oxytocin.