Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026
Efficacy of wound protectors in reducing surgical site infections in patients undergoing open colorectal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Desai Arusha, Bisht Rahul, Misra Sidharth, Kritya Mangesh, Bhardwaj Anjali, Chakraborty Soubhik, Pisipati Tejaswini
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs) has been reported to be significantly higher in colorectal surgeries compared to other surgical procedures. Wound protectors have been developed to help reduce the incidence of SSIs by creating a barrier between the incisional wound and the contaminated surgical field, but their efficacy remains uncertain.
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the use of wound protectors reduces the incidence of SSIs in patients undergoing open colorectal surgery.
DATA SOURCES: A comprehensive literature review was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane databases from inception to January 2025.
STUDY SELECTION: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy of wound protectors for reducing the incidence of SSIs in patients undergoing open colorectal surgery.
INTERVENTIONS: The intervention consisted of wound protectors (e.g., Alexis O-ring wound retractors, plastic ring drape).
MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: The main outcome was SSI. We pooled risk ratios (RRs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) using a random effects model. Statistical analysis was performed using R software (version 4.4.2).
RESULTS: We included 6 RCTs comprising 666 patients, of whom 327 (49 %) were randomised to the wound protectors' group. The mean follow-up duration was 30 days post-operatively. The incidence of SSIs was significantly lower in the intervention group (RR 0.44; 95% CI 0.22-0.88; p = 0.021). Subgroup analysis of four RCTs evaluating Alexis-O ring wound retractors showed a significantly lower incidence of SSIs in the experimental group (RR 0.21; 95% CI 0.09-0.48; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Wound protectors were associated with a significantly lower incidence of SSIs in patients undergoing open colorectal surgery.
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the use of wound protectors reduces the incidence of SSIs in patients undergoing open colorectal surgery.
DATA SOURCES: A comprehensive literature review was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane databases from inception to January 2025.
STUDY SELECTION: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy of wound protectors for reducing the incidence of SSIs in patients undergoing open colorectal surgery.
INTERVENTIONS: The intervention consisted of wound protectors (e.g., Alexis O-ring wound retractors, plastic ring drape).
MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: The main outcome was SSI. We pooled risk ratios (RRs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) using a random effects model. Statistical analysis was performed using R software (version 4.4.2).
RESULTS: We included 6 RCTs comprising 666 patients, of whom 327 (49 %) were randomised to the wound protectors' group. The mean follow-up duration was 30 days post-operatively. The incidence of SSIs was significantly lower in the intervention group (RR 0.44; 95% CI 0.22-0.88; p = 0.021). Subgroup analysis of four RCTs evaluating Alexis-O ring wound retractors showed a significantly lower incidence of SSIs in the experimental group (RR 0.21; 95% CI 0.09-0.48; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Wound protectors were associated with a significantly lower incidence of SSIs in patients undergoing open colorectal surgery.