MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.7863/jum.1988.7.2.77

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 1988

High frequency breast ultrasound. Hand-held versus automated units; examination for palpable mass versus screening.

Kimme-Smith C, Bassett L W, Gold R H

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Four hundred forty-five patients had one or more breast ultrasound examinations with equipment from six manufacturers, operating at 5, 7.5, or 10 MHz. Two hundred seven patients were examined by both automated and hand-held units. In revealing cysts and solid masses, the automated and hand-held units performed nearly identically. Of 198 patients who had screening mammograms, ultrasound evaluation revealed that 85 (43%) had cysts, while 32 (16%) had solid masses. Of the 207 patients who had diagnostic mammograms for a palpable mass, 63 (30.4%) had cysts, while an equal number had solid masses. Of 45 solid masses from both groups that were imaged and biopsied, all 15 that were malignant were palpable. No nonpalpable malignancies were found by ultrasound alone.

Для цитирования: Kimme-Smith C, Bassett L W, Gold R H. High frequency breast ultrasound. Hand-held versus automated units; examination for palpable mass versus screening.. Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. 1988. DOI: 10.7863/jum.1988.7.2.77.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.