QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians · 2021
Assessment of the adequacy of counselling regarding reproductive-related issues in women of childbearing age on anti-epileptic drugs.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Murphy O C, Wrigley S, Walsh R A, Freir D B, McCarthy A J, O'Dowd S, McCabe D J H
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The use of anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) in women of childbearing age (WCBA) necessitates careful counselling regarding reproductive-related issues.
AIM: (i) To compare documentation of appropriate counselling regarding reproductive-related issues in WCBA prescribed AEDs for non-epilepsy vs. epilepsy indications, and (ii) to examine whether the frequency of counselling improved after introduction of 'standardized typed advice'.
DESIGN: Retrospective audit and quality assessment and improvement programme.
METHODS: We analysed medical records of all WCBA prescribed gabapentin, pregabalin, topiramate, valproate or carbamazepine by a general neurology clinical service before (Study period A) and after (Study period B) introduction of standardized typed passages regarding potential teratogenicity ± interactions with hormonal contraception at a university teaching hospital. The χ2 test or the Fisher's exact test was employed, as appropriate.
RESULTS: In WCBA prescribed AEDs for non-epilepsy indications, documentation of appropriate counselling regarding potential teratogenicity improved from 49% (17/35 patients) in Period A to 79% (27/34 patients) in Period B (P = 0.008). The frequency of counselling regarding teratogenicity was higher in patients prescribed AEDs for epilepsy compared with non-epilepsy indications in Study period A (100% vs. 49%, P = 0.002), but was no longer significantly different in Study period B (86% vs. 79%, P = 0.64). Documentation of counselling regarding potential interaction of enzyme-inducing AEDs with hormonal contraception did not significantly change between study periods.
CONCLUSION: Significant improvements in documentation regarding potential teratogenicity of AEDs prescribed for non-epilepsy indications can be achieved by introducing standardized, typed passages copied to patients. Such a practice change is practical and widely applicable to neurological and non-neurological practice worldwide.
AIM: (i) To compare documentation of appropriate counselling regarding reproductive-related issues in WCBA prescribed AEDs for non-epilepsy vs. epilepsy indications, and (ii) to examine whether the frequency of counselling improved after introduction of 'standardized typed advice'.
DESIGN: Retrospective audit and quality assessment and improvement programme.
METHODS: We analysed medical records of all WCBA prescribed gabapentin, pregabalin, topiramate, valproate or carbamazepine by a general neurology clinical service before (Study period A) and after (Study period B) introduction of standardized typed passages regarding potential teratogenicity ± interactions with hormonal contraception at a university teaching hospital. The χ2 test or the Fisher's exact test was employed, as appropriate.
RESULTS: In WCBA prescribed AEDs for non-epilepsy indications, documentation of appropriate counselling regarding potential teratogenicity improved from 49% (17/35 patients) in Period A to 79% (27/34 patients) in Period B (P = 0.008). The frequency of counselling regarding teratogenicity was higher in patients prescribed AEDs for epilepsy compared with non-epilepsy indications in Study period A (100% vs. 49%, P = 0.002), but was no longer significantly different in Study period B (86% vs. 79%, P = 0.64). Documentation of counselling regarding potential interaction of enzyme-inducing AEDs with hormonal contraception did not significantly change between study periods.
CONCLUSION: Significant improvements in documentation regarding potential teratogenicity of AEDs prescribed for non-epilepsy indications can be achieved by introducing standardized, typed passages copied to patients. Such a practice change is practical and widely applicable to neurological and non-neurological practice worldwide.