American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics · 2022
A comparative evaluation of presurgical infant orthopedics of modified Grayson's technique with clear aligners incorporating a nasal elevator in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Batra Puneet, Gribel Bruno Frazāo, Abhinav B A, Raghavan Sreevatsan, Arora Anika
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To assess the differences between 2 methods of presurgical infant orthopedics: the modified Grayson's technique and a new technique using clear aligners in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.
METHODS: For this prospective comparative cohort study, 30 patients were divided into 2 groups: group A (modified Grayson technique) and group B (clear aligner trays), with 15 patients each. Scanned cast measurements were taken before and after treatment and evaluated using an appropriate 3-dimensional software assessing treatment changes in the alveolus (eg, reduction of width between major and minor segment, angulation change of each respective segment [intragroup and intergroup, respectively]). This was supplemented with standardized anterioposterior, Worms-eye view, and profile photographs assessing changes in columellar angle, nostril width, height, nasolabial angle, and soft-tissue cleft gap. Furthermore, the number of visits for each patient group was also tabulated and assessed. The differences were compared using the independent t test and Mann-Whitney U test for the respective parameters.
RESULTS: Groups A and B showed similar posttreatment changes, with no overt significant differences. However, there was a statistically significant difference in the number of visits (P <0.05), with group B having much lower visits to the center than group A. The posttreatment values matched previously established growth reference values. The analysis of photographic measurements showed improved nasal asymmetry in both groups without any significant difference.
CONCLUSIONS: Because there was no difference in the treatment results between the 2 methods and a reduction in the number of required patient visits, presurgical infant orthopedics via clear aligners could pave the way for a more patient-efficient approach.
METHODS: For this prospective comparative cohort study, 30 patients were divided into 2 groups: group A (modified Grayson technique) and group B (clear aligner trays), with 15 patients each. Scanned cast measurements were taken before and after treatment and evaluated using an appropriate 3-dimensional software assessing treatment changes in the alveolus (eg, reduction of width between major and minor segment, angulation change of each respective segment [intragroup and intergroup, respectively]). This was supplemented with standardized anterioposterior, Worms-eye view, and profile photographs assessing changes in columellar angle, nostril width, height, nasolabial angle, and soft-tissue cleft gap. Furthermore, the number of visits for each patient group was also tabulated and assessed. The differences were compared using the independent t test and Mann-Whitney U test for the respective parameters.
RESULTS: Groups A and B showed similar posttreatment changes, with no overt significant differences. However, there was a statistically significant difference in the number of visits (P <0.05), with group B having much lower visits to the center than group A. The posttreatment values matched previously established growth reference values. The analysis of photographic measurements showed improved nasal asymmetry in both groups without any significant difference.
CONCLUSIONS: Because there was no difference in the treatment results between the 2 methods and a reduction in the number of required patient visits, presurgical infant orthopedics via clear aligners could pave the way for a more patient-efficient approach.