Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2020
Validation of the Brazilian Portuguese CAPE-V Instrument-Br CAPE-V for Auditory-Perceptual Analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Behlau Mara, Rocha Bruna, Englert Marina, Madazio Glaucya
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The Consensus Auditory Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) scale is a modern, clinical-scientific approach to voice analysis. It has been translated and culturally adapted to Brazilian Portuguese, but it still lacks validation.
OBJECTIVE: To validate the Brazilian Portuguese version of the CAPE-V scale using the previously translated and culturally adapted version.
METHOD: Forty voice samples were selected (30 dysphonic, 10 nondysphonic), and the degree of vocal deviation was evaluated by a committee of three voice specialists. Nine voice specialists judged the 40 voice samples plus 20% repetition (total of 48 samples) using the CAPE-V. To ensure construct validity of the CAPE-V, its analysis was compared to the Grade-Roughness-Breathiness-Asthenia-Strain (GRBAS) scale that was performed 48-72 hours later. Finally, the intra- and inter-rater reliability values were verified and the correlation between the nine judges and the previously defined evaluation was analyzed.
RESULTS: The Brazilian CAPE-V presented significant intra (0.860-0.997) and inter-rater reliability values (0.707-0.964) for the overall degree and strong correlation with GRBAS (above 0.828). Deviant voice quality had greater consensus among raters than normal voices. A strong correlation was observed between the analysis of the nine raters and that of the committee.
CONCLUSION: CAPE-V is an important diagnostic instrument that contributes to the standardization of vocal quality evaluation in several languages, including Brazilian Portuguese. Thus, its usefulness is neither related to a single language nor to a single set of raters.
OBJECTIVE: To validate the Brazilian Portuguese version of the CAPE-V scale using the previously translated and culturally adapted version.
METHOD: Forty voice samples were selected (30 dysphonic, 10 nondysphonic), and the degree of vocal deviation was evaluated by a committee of three voice specialists. Nine voice specialists judged the 40 voice samples plus 20% repetition (total of 48 samples) using the CAPE-V. To ensure construct validity of the CAPE-V, its analysis was compared to the Grade-Roughness-Breathiness-Asthenia-Strain (GRBAS) scale that was performed 48-72 hours later. Finally, the intra- and inter-rater reliability values were verified and the correlation between the nine judges and the previously defined evaluation was analyzed.
RESULTS: The Brazilian CAPE-V presented significant intra (0.860-0.997) and inter-rater reliability values (0.707-0.964) for the overall degree and strong correlation with GRBAS (above 0.828). Deviant voice quality had greater consensus among raters than normal voices. A strong correlation was observed between the analysis of the nine raters and that of the committee.
CONCLUSION: CAPE-V is an important diagnostic instrument that contributes to the standardization of vocal quality evaluation in several languages, including Brazilian Portuguese. Thus, its usefulness is neither related to a single language nor to a single set of raters.