MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1038/sj.sc.3101635

Медицинская библиотека · Spinal cord · 2004

Relationship between motor FIM and muscle strength in lower cervical-level spinal cord injuries.

Beninato M, O'Kane K S, Sullivan P E

Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеКонтролируемое клиническое исследованиеСтатьяВалидационное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

STUDY

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this research were to, in subjects with lower cervical spinal cord injury (SCI), examine the relationship between strength of muscle groups as measured by the manual muscle test (MMT) and function (reflected as burden of care) as measured by individual functional independence measure (FIM) motor tasks, and investigate the extent to which MMT scores explain the variance of the motor FIM scores.

SETTING

Acute rehabilitation hospitals, Boston, MA, USA.

METHODS

Retrospective pilot study of 20 in-patients, age 18-62 years, with an SCI between C5 and C7. Discharge demographic variables, MMT and motor FIM scores were analyzed. Descriptive statistics, Spearman's rank correlation coefficients, stepwise regressions were performed.

RESULTS

MMT scores for elbow flexion followed by shoulder flexion and wrist extension correlated with the greatest number of FIM tasks. MMT scores explained some part of the variance in the eight of 12 motor FIM tasks. In six of eight tasks, one key muscle explained a large portion of the variance.

CONCLUSION

Key muscles relative to FIM tasks can be identified. These findings may help focus therapeutic interventions aimed at achievement in these tasks.

Для цитирования: Beninato M, O'Kane K S, Sullivan P E. Relationship between motor FIM and muscle strength in lower cervical-level spinal cord injuries.. Spinal cord. 2004. DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101635.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.