MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00268-013-1920-1

Медицинская библиотека · World journal of surgery · 2013

Observation of vocal fold and pharyngeal paralysis after carotid endarterectomy using a magnifying laryngoscope.

Tamaki Tomonori, Node Yoji, Saitou Norihiro, Saigusa Hideto

Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Injury to the vagus nerve or one of its branches during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) can result in vocal fold paralysis (VFP), but the exact mechanisms and site of injury responsible for VFP after CEA are unclear. The aim of this study was to identify the site of nerve injury in patients with VFP after CEA using magnifying laryngoscopy.

METHODS

We performed 96 consecutive CEA procedures in 87 patients over 5 years. After 56 CEA procedures, we examined vocal fold movements with a flexible nasolaryngoscope and detected VFP in 5 of 40 cases (9 %). At 6-8 weeks after CEA, these five patients also underwent magnifying laryngoscopy at another institution by a specialist in vocalization.

RESULTS

We confirmed ipsilateral VFP and pharyngeal paralysis in three patients. The other two patients recovered from their nerve injuries spontaneously before the magnifying examination.

CONCLUSIONS

VFP and pharyngeal paralysis were caused by damage to the recurrent laryngeal and pharyngeal nerves. Therefore, the probable site of nerve injury during CEA was near the inferior vagal ganglion of the vagus nerve trunk in our three patients.

Для цитирования: Tamaki Tomonori, Node Yoji, Saitou Norihiro, Saigusa Hideto. Observation of vocal fold and pharyngeal paralysis after carotid endarterectomy using a magnifying laryngoscope.. World journal of surgery. 2013. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-013-1920-1.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.