Use of Photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) at primary TURB: Potential influence on recurrence and progression rates in NMIBC: a registry-based study using a country cohort.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether department-level use of photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) for primary transurethral bladder resections (TURBs) is associated with recurrence and progression rates in a non-selected, national cohort. Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) has high global prevalence, and is characterized by high recurrence risk and risk of progression to muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Treatment effects and long-term outcomes rely on diagnostic accuracy, which may be enhanced using PDD for TURB. PDD-use in Denmark has varied between departments.  Material and

Methods

We identified all Danish patients with primary NMIBC during 2011-2017 via the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR) and divided them into four groups based on the treating department's annual PDD use. We included 8,502 patients; 76% men, median age at diagnosis: 70 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 63, 77). Primary outcomes were recurrence- and progression risk differences (RDs) at 2 and 5 years depending on the PDD-exposure group. Results were additionally stratified by baseline pathological risk group.

RESULTS

The PDD-use varied from <40% of primary TURBs in group 1 to >74% in group 4. Overall 2- and 5 years recurrence risks were 39.9% [95% CI: 38.8; 41.0] and 48.1% [95% CI: 46.9; 49.3], while risks of progression were 17.5% [95% CI: 16.7; 18.4] and 22.9% [95% CI: 21.9; 23.9]. PDD-exposure groups 2-4 had lower recurrence- and progression risks compared to group 1, most pronounced for high-risk NMIBC.

CONCLUSIONS

PDD-use in primary TURBs correlates with reduced 2- and 5 years recurrence- and progression risks in NMIBC. The PDD benefit was most noticeable in higher risk NMIBC. Photodynamic diagnosis, primary Trans Urethral Resection of the Bladder (TURB), progression risk, recurrence risk.