Pediatrics · 2012
Effects of description of options on parental perinatal decision-making.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Haward Marlyse F, John Leslie K, Lorenz John M, Fischhoff Baruch
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether parents' delivery room management decisions for extremely preterm infants are influenced by (1) the degree of detail with which options (comfort care [CC] or intensive care [IC]) are presented or (2) their order of presentation.
METHODS: A total of 309 volunteers, 18 to 55 years old, were each randomized to 1 of 4 groups: (1) detailed descriptions, CC presented first; (2) detailed descriptions, IC presented first; (3) brief descriptions, CC presented first; or (4) brief descriptions, IC presented first. Each received the description of a hypothetical delivery of a 23-week gestation infant and chose either IC or CC. Open-ended and structured questions elicited reasoning. Data were analyzed by χ(2) and logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: Neither degree of detail, comparing groups 1+2 with 3+4 (37% vs 41%, odds ratio = 0.85, 95% confidence interval = 0.54-1.34, P = .48), nor order, comparing groups 1+3 with 2+4 (40% vs 37%, odds ratio = 0.88, 95% confidence interval = 0.56-1.39; P = .59), influenced the likelihood of choosing IC. Participants choosing IC were more likely to invoke sanctity of life and religiosity as personal values. Additional reasons for choosing IC were experiences with infants born at later gestational ages, giving the infant a chance, not watching their infant die, and equating CC with euthanasia. Some choosing CC wanted to avoid infant suffering.
CONCLUSIONS: The degree of detail and order of presentation had no effect on treatment decisions, suggesting that individuals bring well-articulated preexisting preferences to such decisions. Understanding beliefs and attitudes motivating these preferences can assist physicians in helping parents make informed decisions consistent with their values.
METHODS: A total of 309 volunteers, 18 to 55 years old, were each randomized to 1 of 4 groups: (1) detailed descriptions, CC presented first; (2) detailed descriptions, IC presented first; (3) brief descriptions, CC presented first; or (4) brief descriptions, IC presented first. Each received the description of a hypothetical delivery of a 23-week gestation infant and chose either IC or CC. Open-ended and structured questions elicited reasoning. Data were analyzed by χ(2) and logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: Neither degree of detail, comparing groups 1+2 with 3+4 (37% vs 41%, odds ratio = 0.85, 95% confidence interval = 0.54-1.34, P = .48), nor order, comparing groups 1+3 with 2+4 (40% vs 37%, odds ratio = 0.88, 95% confidence interval = 0.56-1.39; P = .59), influenced the likelihood of choosing IC. Participants choosing IC were more likely to invoke sanctity of life and religiosity as personal values. Additional reasons for choosing IC were experiences with infants born at later gestational ages, giving the infant a chance, not watching their infant die, and equating CC with euthanasia. Some choosing CC wanted to avoid infant suffering.
CONCLUSIONS: The degree of detail and order of presentation had no effect on treatment decisions, suggesting that individuals bring well-articulated preexisting preferences to such decisions. Understanding beliefs and attitudes motivating these preferences can assist physicians in helping parents make informed decisions consistent with their values.