MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1682/jrrd.2005.10.0167

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of rehabilitation research and development · 2007

Assessment of upper limb in tetraplegia: considerations in evaluation and outcomes research.

Mulcahey M J, Hutchinson Dave, Kozin Scott

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

This article briefly discusses several measurement tools for evaluating the upper limb of persons with tetraplegia. Muscle strength testing and electrodiagnostics are discussed as they relate to technique and usefulness for clinical trials. Standardized measures of hand function are reviewed; their limitations for clinical trials during acute spinal cord injury (SCI) care are acknowledged and their strengths for interventional studies and clinical trials during chronic phases of SCI care are defined. Recommendations are set forth for incorporating the International Classification for Surgery of the Hand in Tetraplegia motor and sensory examinations as adjuncts to the International Standards for Neurological Classification of SCI motor and sensory examinations and for further developing electrodiagnostic techniques as measurement tools for acute clinical trials. The Grasp and Release Test is described and recommended for clinical trials involving persons in the chronic stages of SCI. Lastly, we note that much work remains in the development, validation, and clinical deployment of an assessment of upper-limb function in SCI.

Для цитирования: Mulcahey M J, Hutchinson Dave, Kozin Scott. Assessment of upper limb in tetraplegia: considerations in evaluation and outcomes research.. Journal of rehabilitation research and development. 2007. DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2005.10.0167.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.