Archives of dermatology · 1997
Intralesional fluorouracil/epinephrine injectable gel for treatment of condylomata acuminata. A phase 3 clinical study.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Swinehart J M, Sperling M, Phillips S, Kraus S, Gordon S, McCarty J M, Webster G F, Skinner R, Korey A, Orenberg E K
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND DESIGN: A new intralesional sustained-release chemotherapy is under development as a treatment for condylomata acuminata; it is administered as an injectable gel that consists of fluorouracil and epinephrine with a purified bovine collagen as the gellant (fluorouracil/epinephrine gel). In this randomized, double-blind study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of this intralesional treatment in 401 patients, using 2 active drug formulations (fluorouracil/epinephrine gel and fluorouracil gel alone) and a placebo. Each lesion was injected once a week for up to 6 weeks, and patients were followed up for 3 months.
RESULTS: A total of 359 patients with 1926 condylomata underwent evaluation. For all lesions treated with fluorouracil/epinephrine gel, the complete response (CR) rate was 77%. For all patients treated with fluorouracil/epinephrine gel, the CR rate was 61%. The fluorouracil/epinephrine gel was significantly more effective (P < .002) in treating condylomata than the fluorouracil gel without epinephrine (CR rate, 43%); both were superior to placebo (CR rate, 5%). At 3 months after completion of treatment, recurrence rates in patients with CRs were as follows: fluorouracil/epinephrine gel group, 50%; fluorouracil gel group, 58%. No clinically significant drug-related systemic reactions occurred. Finally, the type and severity of local tissue reactions of patients with a positive pretreatment collagen skin test result (6/401 [1.5%]) were similar to those of patients with a negative collagen skin test result.
CONCLUSION: The fluorouracil/epinephrine injectable gel is a safe and effective treatment for condylomata acuminata.
RESULTS: A total of 359 patients with 1926 condylomata underwent evaluation. For all lesions treated with fluorouracil/epinephrine gel, the complete response (CR) rate was 77%. For all patients treated with fluorouracil/epinephrine gel, the CR rate was 61%. The fluorouracil/epinephrine gel was significantly more effective (P < .002) in treating condylomata than the fluorouracil gel without epinephrine (CR rate, 43%); both were superior to placebo (CR rate, 5%). At 3 months after completion of treatment, recurrence rates in patients with CRs were as follows: fluorouracil/epinephrine gel group, 50%; fluorouracil gel group, 58%. No clinically significant drug-related systemic reactions occurred. Finally, the type and severity of local tissue reactions of patients with a positive pretreatment collagen skin test result (6/401 [1.5%]) were similar to those of patients with a negative collagen skin test result.
CONCLUSION: The fluorouracil/epinephrine injectable gel is a safe and effective treatment for condylomata acuminata.