Are outcomes of extremely preterm infants improving? Impact of Bayley assessment on outcomes.
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Vohr Betty R, Stephens Bonnie E, Higgins Rosemary D, Bann Carla M, Hintz Susan R, Das Abhik, Newman Jamie E, Peralta-Carcelen Myriam, Yolton Kimberly, Dusick Anna M, Evans Patricia W, Goldstein Ricki F, Ehrenkranz Richard A, Pappas Athina, Adams-Chapman Ira, Wilson-Costello Deanne E, Bauer Charles R, Bodnar Anna, Heyne Roy J, Vaucher Yvonne E, Dillard Robert G, Acarregui Michael J, McGowan Elisabeth C, Myers Gary J, Fuller Janell, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network
Аннотация
STUDY DESIGN: Scores were compared with bivariate analysis, and regression analyses were run to identify differences in NDI rates.
RESULTS: Mean Bayley III cognitive scores were 11 points higher than mean Bayley II cognitive scores. The NDI rate was reduced by 70% (from 43% in period 1 to 13% in period 2; P < .0001). Multivariate analyses revealed that Bayley III contributed to a decreased risk of NDI by 5 definitions: cognitive score <70 and <85, cognitive or language score <70; cognitive or motor score <70, and cognitive, language, or motor score <70 (P < .001).
CONCLUSION: Whether the Bayley III is overestimating cognitive performance or whether it is a more valid assessment of emerging cognitive skills than the Bayley II is uncertain. Because the Bayley III identifies significantly fewer children with disability, it is recommended that all extremely low birth weight infants be offered early intervention services at the time of discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit, and that Bayley scores be interpreted with caution.