Clinical genitourinary cancer · 2018
Pathologic Nodal Involvement in Patients With Penile Cancer With Cavernosal Versus Spongiosal Involvement.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kearns James T, Winters Brian D, Holt Sarah K, Mossanen Matthew, Lin Daniel W, Wright Jonathan L
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The American Joint Committee on Cancer recently proposed new TNM staging for penile cancer, with proposed T2 as spongiosal invasion and T3 as cavernosal invasion. We sought to validate the proposed staging system for predicting pathologic nodal involvement using the National Cancer Data Base.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Invasive penile cancer cases from 2010 to 2012 were identified. Differences in demographic and pathologic factors between T2 and T3 tumors were compared using χ2 and t tests. Logistic regression was performed to determine the odds of pathologically involved lymph nodes (pN+) by T classification.
RESULTS: There were 378 T2 and 524 T3 patients with penile cancer. Compared with T2 tumors, T3 tumors were larger (mean size, 5.8 cm vs. 4.3 cm), had higher positive surgical margin rates (12% vs. 9%), and were more likely to have lymphovascular invasion (42% vs. 31%) (all P < .05). In multivariable analysis, both T2 (odds ratio [OR], 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-3.3) and T3 (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.4-3.6) remained significantly associated with risk of positive lymph nodes compared with T1 disease, but there was no increase in risk between T2 and T3 disease (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.7-1.8; P = .56).
CONCLUSION: The proposed new American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for the penile cancer distinguishes spongiosal (T2) from cavernosal (T3) involvement. There does not appear to be a difference in positive lymph node status between the 2 grades when other clinical and pathologic variables are considered.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Invasive penile cancer cases from 2010 to 2012 were identified. Differences in demographic and pathologic factors between T2 and T3 tumors were compared using χ2 and t tests. Logistic regression was performed to determine the odds of pathologically involved lymph nodes (pN+) by T classification.
RESULTS: There were 378 T2 and 524 T3 patients with penile cancer. Compared with T2 tumors, T3 tumors were larger (mean size, 5.8 cm vs. 4.3 cm), had higher positive surgical margin rates (12% vs. 9%), and were more likely to have lymphovascular invasion (42% vs. 31%) (all P < .05). In multivariable analysis, both T2 (odds ratio [OR], 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-3.3) and T3 (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.4-3.6) remained significantly associated with risk of positive lymph nodes compared with T1 disease, but there was no increase in risk between T2 and T3 disease (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.7-1.8; P = .56).
CONCLUSION: The proposed new American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for the penile cancer distinguishes spongiosal (T2) from cavernosal (T3) involvement. There does not appear to be a difference in positive lymph node status between the 2 grades when other clinical and pathologic variables are considered.