The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians · 2025
The effect of patient education on maternal fasting blood glucose in gestational diabetes mellitus in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Paudel Alissa, Pearson Regis C, Mirsky Elizabeth, Quesenberry Wilson Alexandria, Hunzicker Alixandra, Grabeel Kelsey L, Thorne Justin, Maples Jill M
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of patient education interventions on fasting blood glucose (FBG) in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).
METHODS: Electronic search of MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL (EBSCO), Embase (Elsevier), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Clinicaltrials.gov was conducted from inception to September 16, 2022. Randomized controlled trials which evaluated the effect of GDM-specific education on biochemical assessment of FBG during pregnancy or within 6 weeks postpartum in patients with GDM were included. Meta-analysis was performed of studies reporting FBG using a fixed effects model to determine mean blood glucose difference and corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess study quality.
RESULTS: Fourteen randomized controlled trials enrolling 1885 patients were included. A total of 8 studies with 893 participants were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The mean effect size was significant: Cohen's d = -0.53 (95% CI [-0.67, -0.34], z = -7.36; p < 0.001). The overall risk of bias for included studies was low.
CONCLUSION: A GDM-specific education intervention resulted in improved glucose control during pregnancy and up to 6 weeks postpartum. Due to the number of studies a moderator analysis could not be conducted to determine the most effective educational intervention strategies. More studies are needed to determine efficacious interventions that are cost-effective and can be broadly implemented throughout health systems.
METHODS: Electronic search of MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL (EBSCO), Embase (Elsevier), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Clinicaltrials.gov was conducted from inception to September 16, 2022. Randomized controlled trials which evaluated the effect of GDM-specific education on biochemical assessment of FBG during pregnancy or within 6 weeks postpartum in patients with GDM were included. Meta-analysis was performed of studies reporting FBG using a fixed effects model to determine mean blood glucose difference and corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess study quality.
RESULTS: Fourteen randomized controlled trials enrolling 1885 patients were included. A total of 8 studies with 893 participants were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The mean effect size was significant: Cohen's d = -0.53 (95% CI [-0.67, -0.34], z = -7.36; p < 0.001). The overall risk of bias for included studies was low.
CONCLUSION: A GDM-specific education intervention resulted in improved glucose control during pregnancy and up to 6 weeks postpartum. Due to the number of studies a moderator analysis could not be conducted to determine the most effective educational intervention strategies. More studies are needed to determine efficacious interventions that are cost-effective and can be broadly implemented throughout health systems.