Frontiers in nutrition · 2026
The impact and predictive value of refeeding syndrome on the short-term prognosis of patients with severe stroke: a retrospective cohort study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhang Wei, Zhang Shengxiang, Tang Yun, Yu Tao
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Refeeding syndrome (RFS) may have adverse effects on patients. However, the impact of RFS on the prognosis of severe stroke patients remain unclear. This study aims to explore the impact on short-term prognosis of patients with severe stroke.
METHODS: A total of 305 patients were included for retrospective analysis. The electrolyte changes and short-term prognosis between RFS and Non-RFS (NRFS) groups of patients were compared. Besides, the risk factors for prognosis of patients and the predictive efficacy of RFS in patient prognosis were analyzed.
RESULTS: The new acute liver injury (ALI), new acute kidney injury (AKI), new mechanical ventilation (MV), mortality within 28 d, and mRS scores at the discharge were higher in the RFS group than in the NRFS group (p < 0.05). The serum phosphorus level in the RFS group decreased after EN compared to before EN (p < 0.05). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of RFS for predicting poor prognosis in patients with severe stroke was 0.678, with a sensitivity of 64.7%, and a specificity of 61.4%.
CONCLUSION: RFS is an independent risk factor for the patient's functional prognosis, therefore, medical staff should screen high-risk populations as early as possible and provide preventive treatment according to the guidelines.
METHODS: A total of 305 patients were included for retrospective analysis. The electrolyte changes and short-term prognosis between RFS and Non-RFS (NRFS) groups of patients were compared. Besides, the risk factors for prognosis of patients and the predictive efficacy of RFS in patient prognosis were analyzed.
RESULTS: The new acute liver injury (ALI), new acute kidney injury (AKI), new mechanical ventilation (MV), mortality within 28 d, and mRS scores at the discharge were higher in the RFS group than in the NRFS group (p < 0.05). The serum phosphorus level in the RFS group decreased after EN compared to before EN (p < 0.05). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of RFS for predicting poor prognosis in patients with severe stroke was 0.678, with a sensitivity of 64.7%, and a specificity of 61.4%.
CONCLUSION: RFS is an independent risk factor for the patient's functional prognosis, therefore, medical staff should screen high-risk populations as early as possible and provide preventive treatment according to the guidelines.