European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology · 2006
Re-laparotomy after cesarean section.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lurie Samuel, Sadan Oscar, Golan Abraham
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To assess the rate, indications, and outcome of re-laparotomy after cesarean section in the early postoperative period.
DESIGN: A retrospective observational study during a 121-month period.
SETTING: A tertiary care university center.
POPULATION: A cohort of 3380 women who underwent cesarean section out of 18,609 parturients.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of re-laparotomy after cesarean section in the early postoperative period.
RESULTS: The incidence of re-laparotomy after cesarean section was 0.53% (18/3380). Of these 18 women, 12 (66%) were operated for hemorrhage, 3 (17%) for eventration, and 3 (17%) for formation of intra-abdominal abscess. Hysterectomy was required in one case (5.5%). We had no maternal mortalities.
CONCLUSION: Although the incidence of re-laparotomy after cesarean in the early postoperative period is low and the outcome is favorable, several measures must be undertaken to reduce the need for re-laparotomy.
DESIGN: A retrospective observational study during a 121-month period.
SETTING: A tertiary care university center.
POPULATION: A cohort of 3380 women who underwent cesarean section out of 18,609 parturients.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of re-laparotomy after cesarean section in the early postoperative period.
RESULTS: The incidence of re-laparotomy after cesarean section was 0.53% (18/3380). Of these 18 women, 12 (66%) were operated for hemorrhage, 3 (17%) for eventration, and 3 (17%) for formation of intra-abdominal abscess. Hysterectomy was required in one case (5.5%). We had no maternal mortalities.
CONCLUSION: Although the incidence of re-laparotomy after cesarean in the early postoperative period is low and the outcome is favorable, several measures must be undertaken to reduce the need for re-laparotomy.