Menopause (New York, N.Y.) · 2013
Menopause after a history of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Turunen Kaisa, Helander Kristiina, Mattila Kari J, Sumanen Markku
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy is a hormone-provoked disorder that fades quickly after parturition. The aim of this study was to establish whether a history of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy reduces the use of hormone therapy for menopausal symptoms and, irrespective of hormone therapy, whether intrahepatic cholestasis is associated with other health aspects after menopause.
METHODS: In 2010, questionnaires were sent to a cohort of women who delivered in Tampere University Hospital, Finland, from 1969 to 1988. The study population comprised postmenopausal women with a history of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (n = 189) and their controls (n = 416). The main outcome measures were the use of hormone therapy and other means of alleviating menopausal symptoms, and the diseases the women reported.
RESULTS: There were no differences in the use of hormone therapy between the two groups. Of the diseases reported, breast cancer, hepatobiliary diseases, and hypothyroidism were more frequent among women with a history of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, whereas cardiac arrhythmia was less frequent. With respect to other diseases, there were no differences.
CONCLUSIONS: A history of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy does not reduce the use of hormone therapy. However, when physicians prescribe hormone therapy for these women, a history of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy calls for attention in view of its association with gallstones.
METHODS: In 2010, questionnaires were sent to a cohort of women who delivered in Tampere University Hospital, Finland, from 1969 to 1988. The study population comprised postmenopausal women with a history of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (n = 189) and their controls (n = 416). The main outcome measures were the use of hormone therapy and other means of alleviating menopausal symptoms, and the diseases the women reported.
RESULTS: There were no differences in the use of hormone therapy between the two groups. Of the diseases reported, breast cancer, hepatobiliary diseases, and hypothyroidism were more frequent among women with a history of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, whereas cardiac arrhythmia was less frequent. With respect to other diseases, there were no differences.
CONCLUSIONS: A history of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy does not reduce the use of hormone therapy. However, when physicians prescribe hormone therapy for these women, a history of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy calls for attention in view of its association with gallstones.