DOI 10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20267902.29
Comparison of Ureteral Stone Volume and Maximum Stone Length in Predicting Shock Wave Lithotripsy Success.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
This study aimed to compare maximum stone length and stone volume as predictors of stone-free (SF) status after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) for ureteral stones.
METHODS
Data from 236 patients treated with SWL for solitary radiopaque ureteral stone (5-15 mm) between January 2022 and March 2024 were retrospectively analysed. Stone length and volume were measured on noncontrast computed tomography. SF status was determined on radiography and ultrasonography 4 weeks after the last SWL session and defined as no residual stone or < 4 mm residual fragments. Binary logistic regression models were used to evaluate potential predictors of SWL outcome in univariable and multivariable analyses.
RESULTS
The overall SF rate was 68%. The non-SF group had significantly higher body mass index (BMI), Hounsfield unit, maximum stone length, stone volume, skin-to-stone distance and proximal ureteral diameter (all p < 0.05) compared with the SF group. Multivariate analysis revealed maximum stone length (p = 0.004) and BMI (p = 0.009) as independent predictors of SWL outcome, whilst stone volume lost statistical significance (p = 0.2).
CONCLUSIONS
Simple linear stone measurement without routine reliance on computed tomography (CT)-based volumetric assessment appears sufficient for predicting SWL outcomes in ureteral stones. This approach may help avoid the time-consuming nature and potential radiation exposure associated with volumetric analysis. Further prospective, multicentre studies with standardised imaging and large patient cohorts are warranted to confirm these results.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.